We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Generation of environmental persistent free radicals (EPFRs) enhances ecotoxicological effects of the disposable face mask waste with the COVID-19 pandemic
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed the environmental risks of disposable face masks discarded during the COVID-19 pandemic, finding they release microplastics, metals, and organic pollutants into the environment. They discovered that the masks also generate environmentally persistent free radicals, an emerging risk factor that contributes to cytotoxicity and oxidative stress. The study found that surgical masks released more contaminants and posed higher environmental risk than N95 respirators.
A large amount of disposable plastic face masks (DPFs) is produced and used during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, which results in an inevitable consequence of the dramatic increase of DPFs waste. However, the impact of DPFs exposure to the environment on their toxicity is rarely considered. In this study, a range of 76-276 items/L microplastics (MPs) was detected in the DPFs leachates, and fibrous (> 80.3%) and polypropylene (PP, > 89.2%) MPs were dominant. Co, Cu, Ni, Sr, Ti and Zn, were commonly detected in all leachates of the tested DPFs. Organics, such as acetophenone, 2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol, benzothiazole, bisphenol-A and phthalide, were found in the DPFs leachate, which were including organic solvents and plasticizer. Besides, we first found an emerging environmental risk substance, namely environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs), was generated in the DPFs leachates. The characteristic g-factors of the EPFRs was in a range of 2.003-2.004, identified as mixture of carbon- and oxygen-centered radicals. By means of in vitro toxicity assay, the DPFs leachate were confirmed to cause cytotoxicity and oxidative stress. Significantly, it is found that the formed EPFRs could contribute more toxic effects. Furthermore, when compared to N95 respirators, the tested surgical masks tend to release more MPs, leach more metals and organics, and generate more EPFRs. Surgical masks were thus showed higher risk than N95 respirators after exposure to water. This work highlights the importance of understanding the chemical complexity and possible toxicity of DPFs for their risk assessment.
More Papers Like This
Uncovering the Release of Micro/nanoplastics from Disposable Face Masks at Times of COVID-19
AI summary Read the abstract
This study confirmed that disposable face masks release micro- and nanoplastic particles under environmental conditions including water exposure and mechanical stress. The release was enhanced by simulated weathering, raising concern about the environmental persistence and pollution potential of pandemic-era mask waste.
Environmental impacts of covid-19 pandemic: Release of microplastics, organic contaminants and trace metals from face masks under ambient environmental conditions
AI summary Read the abstract
This study monitored microplastic, organic contaminant, and toxic metal release from COVID-19 face masks under open-environment exposure conditions rather than only controlled laboratory forces, finding that environmental weathering substantially increased release rates over time. The findings provide more realistic estimates of the pollution burden from the estimated 1.24 trillion masks discarded during the pandemic.
A review of disposable facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic: A focus on microplastics release
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the environmental threats posed by disposable face masks used during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on microplastic release. Researchers found that discarded masks undergo physical and chemical degradation in the environment, generating microplastics that contaminate both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The study provides an overview of current knowledge on microplastic extraction methods and proposes strategies for controlling mask-related plastic pollution through source reduction and improved waste management.
Uncovering the Release of Micro/nanoplastics from Disposable Face Masks at Times of COVID-19
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found that disposable face masks release significant amounts of micro- and nanoplastic particles when subjected to water exposure and mechanical stress similar to environmental conditions. This confirms that the massive use of masks during COVID-19 introduced new sources of microplastic pollution into the environment.
Current knowledge on the presence, biodegradation, and toxicity of discarded face masks in the environment
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the environmental fate of discarded face masks from the COVID-19 pandemic, covering their degradation, chemical release, and ecological toxicity. Researchers found that disposable masks break down slowly in the environment, releasing microplastic fibers and chemical additives that harm aquatic and terrestrial organisms. The study calls for improved disposal practices and further research into the long-term environmental consequences of pandemic-related mask waste.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.