0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Relative contributions of different local sources to riverborne microplastic in a mixed landuse area within a tropical catchment

Environmental Research 2022 23 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Hui Ling Chen, Sivathass Bannir Selvam, Kang‐Nee Ting, Kim Yeow Tshai, Christopher Gibbins

Summary

Researchers quantified the relative contributions of different land-use sources to riverborne microplastics in a tropical catchment, providing data to help prioritize pollution reduction measures for protecting human and ecological health.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Information on the relative contributions of microplastics coming from different sources is important to help prioritise measures to reduce river contamination levels and limit human and ecological health risks. This paper reports on work which aimed to quantitatively assess the relative concentrations and types of microplastic delivered from differed sources to a second order river. The study was undertaken in a mixed landuse area within a rapidly urbanising catchment in Malaysia. Over a six-week period, water samples were collected from road culverts and drains in residential and industrial areas across the area to assess microplastic concentrations, while inputs from atmospheric deposition and wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were also quantified. Microplastic fibres and fragments were the dominant material in all sources, with the majority consisting of styrene-butadiene rubber and nylon. Culverts draining main roads were the main contributor to riverborne microplastic, delivering 42.20 ± 35.29 particles/L directly to the river channel. Road inputs were up to seven times greater than those from residential (8.53 ± 9.91 particles/L) and industrial (5.67 ± 4.88 particles/L) areas. The five WWTPs had removal efficiencies of between 30.95 ± 5.51% and 69.94 ± 22.17%, with their outflows delivering microplastics to the river in concentrations similar to those in uncontrolled residential and industrial drains. Atmospheric deposition across the study area was estimated to be 76.07 ± 32.85 particles/m/day (=8.35 ± 5.11 particles/L). Mitigation strategies in the study area should focus on improving management of water draining roads, and re-routing discharges from domestic and industrial areas to WWTPs rather than allowing them to flow directly to the river. The low efficiencies of some of the WWTPs are not unusual, and indicate the need for additional water treatment to deal with microplastic present in wastewater.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

A multidimensional approach for microplastics monitoring in two major tropical river basins, Malaysia

Researchers conducted a multidimensional assessment of microplastic distribution in surface waters of two major Malaysian river basins, providing much-needed field data on microplastic emissions from Asian rivers known to be major contributors to ocean pollution.

Article Tier 2

Point-source microplastic input to the river and coastal zone via wastewater treatment facilities: a case study from a tropical mega-city

Point-source inputs of microplastics from a specific industrial or municipal source were quantified in both a river and the adjacent coastal zone. The study links land-based pollution sources to downstream and coastal microplastic concentrations, supporting targeted source-control interventions.

Article Tier 2

Quantifying microplastic fluvial flux from a coastal watershed—A microplastic rating curve approach

Researchers quantified the flux of microplastics transported by rivers to the coast from a single watershed, providing a mass balance for how much plastic a defined catchment exports. Such flux estimates are essential building blocks for calculating global land-to-ocean plastic budgets.

Article Tier 2

Abundance, Distribution and Drivers of Microplastic Contaminant in Urban River Environments

Researchers surveyed microplastic distribution in urban river environments and identified key drivers of accumulation hotspots, finding that land use, hydrology, and infrastructure factors concentrated microplastics at predictable locations that could inform targeted management interventions.

Article Tier 2

Land use-based characterization and source apportionment of microplastics in urban storm runoffs in a tropical region

Urban stormwater runoff in a tropical monsoon region contained 4.7 particles/L and 3.8 mg/L microplastics on average, with concentrations following land use order of industrial > transportation > commercial > residential, and approximately 85% of sources identifiable by morphology and polymer type.

Share this paper