We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Evaluation of conventional wastewater treatment plants efficiency to remove microplastics in terms of abundance, size, shape, and type: A systematic review and Meta-analysis
Summary
Conventional wastewater treatment plants progressively reduce microplastic abundance from ~124 items/L in influent down to ~2 items/L after tertiary treatment, but significant publication bias was detected across the 77 studies analyzed, suggesting reported removal efficiencies may be skewed.
In the present study Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed as electronic databases were used to find work published up to October 27, 2020 about microplastics evaluation in conventional wastewater treatment plants. In total, 407 publications were found, of which 77 were eligible for meta-analysis. A comprehensive meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relevant publications regarding microplastics abundance. The average microplastics abundance was within the 1-31,400, 0.2-12,580, 0.002-7863, and 0.003-447 items range per liter wastewater for influent, primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment steps, respectively. The difference between the abundance of microplastics characterization for the different treatment steps was analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test (depending on the data distribution). According to the pooled data, the average microplastics abundance was 124.04, 20.67, 5.62, and 1.97 (items/l) for influent, primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment. The results of Egger's test (t = 7.49, P ≤ 0.0001) were statistically significant, suggesting the existence of publication bias.
Sign in to start a discussion.