0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

Evaluation of conventional wastewater treatment plants efficiency to remove microplastics in terms of abundance, size, shape, and type: A systematic review and Meta-analysis

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2022 77 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 55 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Nahid Azizi, Ramin Nabizadeh, Nahid Azizi, Nahid Azizi, Nahid Azizi, Simin Nasseri, Meghdad Pirsaheb Ramin Nabizadeh, Ramin Nabizadeh, Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Nahid Azizi, Meghdad Pirsaheb Simin Nasseri, Neamat Jaafarzadeh, Ramin Nabizadeh, Simin Nasseri, Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Nahid Azizi, Neamat Jaafarzadeh, Neamat Jaafarzadeh, Nahid Azizi, Nahid Azizi, Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Ramin Nabizadeh, Ramin Nabizadeh, Ramin Nabizadeh, Neamat Jaafarzadeh, Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Nahid Azizi, Nahid Azizi, Meghdad Pirsaheb Meghdad Pirsaheb Nahid Azizi, Meghdad Pirsaheb

Summary

Conventional wastewater treatment plants progressively reduce microplastic abundance from ~124 items/L in influent down to ~2 items/L after tertiary treatment, but significant publication bias was detected across the 77 studies analyzed, suggesting reported removal efficiencies may be skewed.

Study Type Review

In the present study Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed as electronic databases were used to find work published up to October 27, 2020 about microplastics evaluation in conventional wastewater treatment plants. In total, 407 publications were found, of which 77 were eligible for meta-analysis. A comprehensive meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the relevant publications regarding microplastics abundance. The average microplastics abundance was within the 1-31,400, 0.2-12,580, 0.002-7863, and 0.003-447 items range per liter wastewater for influent, primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment steps, respectively. The difference between the abundance of microplastics characterization for the different treatment steps was analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test (depending on the data distribution). According to the pooled data, the average microplastics abundance was 124.04, 20.67, 5.62, and 1.97 (items/l) for influent, primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment. The results of Egger's test (t = 7.49, P ≤ 0.0001) were statistically significant, suggesting the existence of publication bias.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper