We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Do We Speak the Same Language for Reference Particles in Microplastic Research?
Summary
This paper argues that the microplastics research community lacks agreement on standardized reference particles for laboratory experiments, making it difficult to compare results across studies. The authors call for consensus on definitions and materials to improve the reproducibility and policy relevance of microplastic research.
Despite the high number of scientific publications on related topics, such as sustainability, pollution control, etc., research on microplastic (MP) is still in its infancy. To advance the quality of future MP investigations, scientists have recently called for harmonization regarding the definition and categorization of MP, as well as for consensus in sampling and investigations methodologies. The application of standardized and fully characterized MP particles, which are commercially available on a large scale but rarely characterized by manufacturers, could add another piece to that mosaic. This publication aims to introduce ten low-priced MP powders that can be used as reference particles in future MP studies. The physical parameters shape, particle density and particle size distribution were examined, and results compared to technical information reports and data sheets, available. Particle densities were almost in line with the manufacturer’s information. However, significant leaks could be revealed for particle size specifications, thus underlining the demand for an accurate description of the particle size distribution, e.g., D50 or D90.