0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

Systematic Literature Review and Critical Appraisal of Mammalian Reproductive Studies Evaluation Potential Effects Associated with Microplastics

OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) 2022
Isabel Lea, Willem Faber, Seneca Fitch, Janice Britt, Daniele Wikoff, Richard Becker, Erik Rushton, Lauren Brown, Sue Marty, Jens Otte, Steffen Schneider, Susan Borghoff, Robert Ellis-Hutchings

Summary

This systematic review evaluates studies on how microplastics may affect reproduction in mammals. It summarizes existing research to assess the quality of evidence linking microplastic exposure to reproductive harm, including dose-response relationships. The review also proposes best practices for future studies, which is important for building a clearer picture of microplastic risks to fertility and reproductive health.

Body Systems
Study Type Review

This systematic review aims to identify and evaluate mammalian reproductive studies assessing the potential effects associated with microplastics in the context of hazard and risk assessment (including dose-response). During this review process, emphasis will be placed on the refinement of critical appraisal approaches to evaluate the internal and construct validity of each relevant study based on known methodological attributes important to microplastics and the outcomes of interest. Additionally, criteria and best practices to be considered for future reproductive toxicity studies of microplastics will be discussed.

Share this paper