0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Introduction to Textile Pollution

2022 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Judith S. Weis, Mariacristina Cocca, Francesca De Falco

Summary

This introductory chapter examines textile-derived microplastic pollution, reviewing evidence that microfibers are the most commonly found plastic shape inside wild animals, potentially due to their relative environmental abundance and reduced egestion rates compared to other particle shapes. The review covers ingestion across marine mammals, birds, fish, macroinvertebrates, and plankton, and discusses how polymer type, size, and shape influence the degree of biological effects.

Body Systems

Microplastics (MPs) are pieces of plastic ranging from 5 millimeter in size down to microscopic. The number of MPs found in water samples depends on the collecting methods. Ingestion has been reported in marine mammals, birds, fishes, macroinvertebrates and plankton. Most of the plastics found inside animals in the field are MFs, which may reflect their relative abundance in the environment, and/or potentially that they are not eliminated as readily as other shapes. It is important to study to what degree MPs can move out of the digestive system into other tissues rather than being egested. Most laboratory studies of trophic transfer used microspheres (MSs), despite the fact that they are scarce in the environment. The degree and type of effects that MPs produce depends on polymer type, size, shape, concentration, exposure time, and adsorbed chemicals. The washing process of textiles is identified as one of the major sources of MF pollution.

Share this paper