0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microfibre Methodologies for the Field and Laboratory

2022 2 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Abigail Barrows, Courtney A. Neumann

Summary

This methods chapter reviews field and laboratory sampling methodologies for microfibers as a subset of microplastic pollution, examining the lack of standardized protocols across aquatic surface, freshwater, air, ice, deep sea, sediment, and biological sample matrices. The review covers existing approaches to harmonizing collection procedures and highlights the particular challenges of microfiber analysis given their ubiquity and morphological diversity.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastic is a pervasive pollutant found in every studied environment. One type of microplastic, the microfibre, is arguably the most ubiquitous. The field of microplastic research has had a distinct lack of standardized field and laboratory methodologies, despite concerted streamlining efforts made by the scientific community. Initial microplastic research focused heavily on sampling aquatic surface environments using a variety of techniques. The field has expanded to sample microplastic from freshwater, air, ice, snow, the water column, the deep sea, sediment, sand, animals, and human food and beverages. Studies often adopt different sampling methodologies, although most researchers have tried to harmonize sampling procedures when possible. Standardizing collection procedures from such variable sampling environments can prove difficult. Microplastic laboratory processing and analysis have been just as diverse, perhaps even more so, as field techniques. This chapter will highlight the current best practices for field and analytical methods, with a focus on techniques best suited for characterizing microfibres.

Share this paper