0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

How to Navigate the Tricky Landscape of Sustainability Claims in the Food Sector

European Journal of Risk Regulation 2022 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sarah Arayess, Alie de Boer

Summary

This review analyzes the fragmented EU regulatory landscape for sustainability claims in the food sector, finding that no specific harmonized legislation exists for environmental, social, or economic sustainability claims on food products. The authors map existing EU legislative initiatives that partially apply to food sustainability claims and argue for a clear definitional framework to enable enforceable and meaningful sustainability labeling.

Abstract Consumers are increasingly interested in the sustainability of food products, but so far, no specific European Union (EU) legislation has been developed to harmonise sustainability claims. We analyse which efforts already undertaken within the EU dealing with sustainability claims on products apply to sustainable food claims. We show that whilst sustainability can address three different dimensions (environmental, social and economic), it is crucial to clearly define sustainability in order to allow for the development of concrete regulations and guidance documents. EU legislative initiatives so far seem to be focused on environmental aspects, whilst Member States approach sustainability more broadly. At the same time, substantiation methods can only be successful when sustainability is well defined. We conclude that whilst there is a large range of initiatives taken at different levels, the foundation of these initiatives remains weak when there is no clear scope of terminology nor clarification of substantiation requirements. Currently existing self-regulatory initiatives could support protecting consumers from misleading claims by providing specific provisions for (food) business operators on how to make sustainability claims. Only when claims can be trusted and understood by consumers will they be able to make more sustainable purchase decisions. This plays an important role in the overall policy objective of the EU of climate neutrality by 2050.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Sustainable food packaging: An updated definition following a holistic approach

Researchers proposed an updated, holistic definition for sustainable food packaging by analyzing 38 related terms across the food systems domain. The study found that the lack of a commonly accepted definition has led to uninformed packaging choices by stakeholders throughout the value chain, and the work aims to help producers, distributors, practitioners, and consumers make better decisions about sustainable food packaging alternatives.

Systematic Review Tier 1

Sustainability outcomes of the United States food system: A systematic review

This systematic review identified 93 sustainability outcomes of the U.S. food system across environmental, socio-economic, and health themes, finding that socio-economic outcomes are significantly underrepresented in the literature. The study reveals that food systems research remains siloed across disciplines, with natural science journals rarely addressing social dimensions. Environmental contaminants including microplastics are among the emerging concerns that span multiple outcome categories in food system sustainability.

Article Tier 2

Pitfalls of ambiguity in the development of safe and sustainable biobased plastics: How can industry and regulators better navigate this landscape?

This policy analysis examines how vague and inconsistent definitions of 'biobased,' 'biodegradable,' and 'bioplastic' across EU regulations create confusion for industry and regulators trying to reduce microplastic pollution. The authors propose a decision tree to clarify polymer classification, which is important because mislabeled bioplastics may still shed persistent microplastics in the environment.

Article Tier 2

The Ephemeral Term “Sustainable Development” in Current EU Policies

Not relevant to microplastics — this policy analysis paper examines how the term 'sustainable development' is used inconsistently and with contradictory meanings across current European Union policies, using textual and conceptual review methods.

Article Tier 2

Managing Microplastics for Sustainable Agriculture : Legal and Policy Perspectives from the EU and Serbia

This review examines existing EU and Serbian legal frameworks, regulatory approaches, and policy measures addressing microplastic management in agriculture, analyzing how current and proposed legislation supports sustainable farming goals and food safety under the 2030 Agenda.

Share this paper