We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics in Latin America and the Caribbean: On the adoption of reporting standards and quality assurance and quality control protocols
Summary
This review of 193 microplastic studies from Latin America and the Caribbean found that over 80% lacked standardized analytical protocols and quality assurance controls, making cross-study comparisons unreliable. Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile contributed the most research, with marine ecosystems and biota (primarily fish) as the most studied targets.
We reviewed the current status of microplastic research in Latin America and the Caribbean based on a sample of 193 papers that analyzed environmental microplastic concentration in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Most of the reviewed papers were published from researchers based on Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Chile. Overall, 63.1% of the papers studied microplastics in marine ecosystems, followed by the study of freshwater ecosystems (18.2%), estuarine (13.6%) and terrestrial environments (5.1%). Biota samples were analyzed by 40.3% of the studies, while 34.4% studied sediment samples (beach sand and submerged sediments) and 25.3% focused on water samples. Over 80% of the papers that studied microplastics in biota samples analyzed fish. There was high variability in the reported parameters employed for characterizing environmental microplastics (color, shape, and concentration units), attributed to the lack of standardized analysis guidelines for microplastic studies. Additionally, most papers adopted few quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) protocols to avoid cross-contamination during the analytical process. At least four open access standard protocols and guidelines for microplastic analysis and monitoring programs were found since 2015, and 92% of the papers were published after said date. Nevertheless, most studies did not employ any standardized methodology for the analysis of microplastics. We recommend the adoption of a standard and QA/QC protocol for future microplastic studies in Latin America and the Caribbean to establish a cohesive baseline of microplastic data in the region and create long-term monitoring programs.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Review of current trends, advances and analytical challenges for microplastics contamination in Latin America
This review compiled 78 studies on microplastic contamination across Latin America and found that research in the region remains limited, with Brazil accounting for 34% of all studies. Fibers were the most prevalent microplastic type found, making up 62% of particles, with polyethylene, polypropylene, PET, and polystyrene accounting for 80% of identified polymers. The study highlights significant gaps in standardized methodologies that make it difficult to establish baseline microplastic pollution levels across the region.
Methodological similarities and discrepancies among studies on microplastics in South American continental aquatic environments
Researchers conducted a systematic review of 57 studies on microplastic pollution in South American continental aquatic environments, identifying significant methodological discrepancies in sampling, detection limits, and sample preparation that limit cross-study comparability and proposing standardization approaches.
Where and how? A systematic review of microplastic pollution on beaches in Latin America and the caribbean (LAC)
Microplastic contamination on Latin American and Caribbean beaches ranged from 0 to 5,458 particles/m2, with the highest accumulations found on ocean island beaches. Brazilian beaches accounted for 43% of all studies, while large stretches of coastline in Cuba, Venezuela, and Argentina had no data, and inconsistent methodologies prevented meaningful cross-study comparison.
A breakthrough in the harmonization of microplastics monitoring protocols in latin american region
This paper describes progress toward harmonizing microplastic monitoring protocols across Latin American countries, aiming to create consistent, comparable data from a region with significant plastic pollution challenges but historically fragmented scientific approaches. Standardized monitoring is a prerequisite for effective regional policy and for understanding how plastic pollution flows through South and Central American river systems.
A breakthrough in the harmonization of microplastics monitoring protocols in latin american region
This paper describes progress toward harmonizing microplastic monitoring protocols across Latin American countries, aiming to create consistent, comparable data from a region with significant plastic pollution challenges but historically fragmented scientific approaches. Standardized monitoring is a prerequisite for effective regional policy and for understanding how plastic pollution flows through South and Central American river systems.