We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Beneficial Use Impairments, Degradation of Aesthetics, and Human Health: A Review
Summary
This review systematically assessed the relationship between environmental aesthetics (green and blue spaces) and human health, finding only 19 qualifying studies in the literature and none that adequately evaluated how remediation or restoration efforts impact community health outcomes. The authors identified a critical gap between the well-supported link connecting greenspace proximity to health benefits and the absence of research on quality improvements.
In environmental programs and blue/green space development, improving aesthetics is a common goal. There is broad interest in understanding the relationship between ecologically sound environments that people find aesthetically pleasing and human health. However, to date, few studies have adequately assessed this relationship, and no summaries or reviews of this line of research exist. Therefore, we undertook a systematic literature review to determine the state of science and identify critical needs to advance the field. Keywords identified from both aesthetics and loss of habitat literature were searched in PubMed and Web of Science databases. After full text screening, 19 studies were included in the review. Most of these studies examined some measure of greenspace/bluespace, primarily proximity. Only one study investigated the impacts of making space quality changes on a health metric. The studies identified for this review continue to support links between green space and various metrics of health, with additional evidence for blue space benefits on health. No studies to date adequately address questions surrounding the beneficial use impairment degradation of aesthetics and how improving either environmental quality (remediation) or ecological health (restoration) efforts have impacted the health of those communities.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Beneficial Use Impairments, Degradation of Aesthetics, and Human Health: A Review
This systematic literature review examined the relationship between environmental aesthetics, ecological quality, and human health outcomes in blue and green space development programs. Researchers found that while improving aesthetics is a common management goal, few studies have adequately quantified the link between aesthetically pleasing ecologically sound environments and measurable human health benefits, identifying a critical knowledge gap.
The Non-Linear Impact of Green Space Recreational Service Performance on Residents’ Emotional States in High-Density Cities
Researchers assessed green space recreational service performance in high-density Chinese cities and modeled its non-linear relationship with residents' emotional well-being. They found that moderate green space quality and accessibility had the strongest positive effects on emotional health, with diminishing returns at very high provision levels, informing urban park planning priorities.
Wasting the Restorative Potential: Influences of Plastic and Biowaste on Psychological Restoration After Real, Virtual, and Imagined Walks
Researchers conducted three studies examining how plastic litter and biowaste in natural environments diminish the psychological restorative benefits of spending time in nature, finding that even imagined or virtually depicted litter reduced positive affect and perceived restoration. The findings highlight pollution as a threat not only to ecological health but also to human mental wellbeing.
An Investigation into the Evaluation and Optimisation Method of Environmental Art Design based on Image Processing and Computer Vision
This paper explores using computer vision and image processing to evaluate environmental art and design installations. It is not related to microplastics or environmental health research. The study focuses entirely on algorithms for assessing visual aesthetics and audience engagement with art.
Impacts of land use/land cover on water quality: a contemporary review for researchers and policymakers
This review examines how different land uses, from farming to urban development, affect water quality through diffuse pollution. Natural vegetation acts as a protective buffer against contamination, but more research is needed to determine how much vegetation is required to effectively filter pollutants. The findings are relevant to microplastic pollution because urban runoff and agricultural land use are major pathways by which microplastics enter drinking water sources.