Meta Analysis
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 1
?
Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence.
Human Health Effects
Nanoplastics
Policy & Risk
Sign in to save
Microplastic and Nanoplastic Interactions with Plant Species: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives
Environmental Science & Technology Letters2022
110 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 70
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Imran Azeem,
Imran Azeem,
Imran Azeem,
Imran Azeem,
Pingfan Zhou,
Muhammad Arslan Ahmad,
Imran Azeem,
Imran Azeem,
Muhammad Adeel,
Muhammad Adeel,
Muhammad Adeel,
Muhammad Adeel,
Muhammad Adeel,
Noman Shakoor,
Jason C. White
Pingfan Zhou,
Noman Shakoor,
Muhammad Adeel,
Muhammad Zain,
Muhammad Arslan Ahmad,
Jason C. White
Muhammad Arslan Ahmad,
Muhammad Arslan Ahmad,
Muhammad Adeel,
Muhammad Arslan Ahmad,
Noman Shakoor,
Muhammad Arslan Ahmad,
Noman Shakoor,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Pingfan Zhou,
Noman Shakoor,
Ming Xu,
Ming Xu,
Noman Shakoor,
Jason C. White
Noman Shakoor,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Muhammad Adeel,
Muhammad Zain,
Yukui Rui,
Muhammad Zain,
Muhammad Zain,
Muhammad Zain,
Jason C. White
Muhammad Zain,
Jason C. White
Pingfan Zhou,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Ming Xu,
Jason C. White
Muhammad Adeel,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Ming Xu,
Muhammad Arslan Ahmad,
Jason C. White
Ming Xu,
Ming Xu,
Muhammad Adeel,
Kamran Azeem,
Kamran Azeem,
Naglaa Yousef,
Naglaa Yousef,
Naglaa Yousef,
Naglaa Yousef,
Jason C. White
Zhao Yinghai,
Zhao Yinghai,
Jason C. White
Pingfan Zhou,
Zhao Yinghai,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Zhao Yinghai,
Kamran Azeem,
Muhammad Adeel,
Kamran Azeem,
Kamran Azeem,
Yukui Rui,
Pingfan Zhou,
Pingfan Zhou,
Yukui Rui,
Ming Xu,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Ming Xu,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Ming Xu,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Yukui Rui,
Yukui Rui,
Yukui Rui,
Yukui Rui,
Ming Xu,
Yukui Rui,
Jason C. White
Jason C. White
Summary
This meta-analysis examines how microplastics and nanoplastics interact with plants, finding effects on germination, growth, and nutrient absorption. The findings raise concerns for human health because crops grown in microplastic-contaminated soil may take up these particles, creating another pathway for microplastics to enter our diet.
Study Type
Review
The ubiquitous presence of nanoplastics (NPx) and microplastics (MPx) in the environment has been demonstrated, and as such, the exposure scenarios, mechanisms of plant response, and ultimate risk must be determined. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of the most recent literature investigating the effect of MPx/NPx on plant species under laboratory and field conditions so as to evaluate the current state of knowledge. Effects of MPx/NPx exposure in plants vary as a function of plant species, and interestingly, nonsignificant responses are reported in staple crops. We found that NPx (<100 nm) more negatively affected plant development parameters, photosynthetic pigments, and biochemical indicators than did MPx (>100 nm). Surprisingly, NPx exposure exhibited negligible effects on germination rate, although root morphology was negatively affected. Alternatively, MPx negatively affected (14%) germination and generally exhibited nonsignificant effects on root morphology. The effect of MPx/NPx on plant health decreases with increasing exposure time. No specific trends were evident for the production of biochemical enzymes as related to MPx/NPx concentration or size. Furthermore, we provided a framework for additional investigative work to address the knowledge gaps and to enable accurate assessment of the fate and risk of these materials to environmental and human health.