0
Meta Analysis ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microplastic and Nanoplastic Interactions with Plant Species: Trends, Meta-Analysis, and Perspectives

Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2022 110 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 70 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Imran Azeem, Imran Azeem, Imran Azeem, Imran Azeem, Pingfan Zhou, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Imran Azeem, Imran Azeem, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Adeel, Noman Shakoor, Jason C. White Pingfan Zhou, Noman Shakoor, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Zain, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Jason C. White Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Noman Shakoor, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Noman Shakoor, Jason C. White Jason C. White Pingfan Zhou, Noman Shakoor, Ming Xu, Ming Xu, Noman Shakoor, Jason C. White Noman Shakoor, Jason C. White Jason C. White Muhammad Adeel, Muhammad Zain, Yukui Rui, Muhammad Zain, Muhammad Zain, Muhammad Zain, Jason C. White Muhammad Zain, Jason C. White Pingfan Zhou, Jason C. White Jason C. White Jason C. White Ming Xu, Jason C. White Muhammad Adeel, Jason C. White Jason C. White Ming Xu, Muhammad Arslan Ahmad, Jason C. White Ming Xu, Ming Xu, Muhammad Adeel, Kamran Azeem, Kamran Azeem, Naglaa Yousef, Naglaa Yousef, Naglaa Yousef, Naglaa Yousef, Jason C. White Zhao Yinghai, Zhao Yinghai, Jason C. White Pingfan Zhou, Zhao Yinghai, Jason C. White Jason C. White Jason C. White Zhao Yinghai, Kamran Azeem, Muhammad Adeel, Kamran Azeem, Kamran Azeem, Yukui Rui, Pingfan Zhou, Pingfan Zhou, Yukui Rui, Ming Xu, Jason C. White Jason C. White Jason C. White Jason C. White Jason C. White Jason C. White Ming Xu, Jason C. White Jason C. White Ming Xu, Jason C. White Jason C. White Yukui Rui, Yukui Rui, Yukui Rui, Yukui Rui, Ming Xu, Yukui Rui, Jason C. White Jason C. White

Summary

This meta-analysis examines how microplastics and nanoplastics interact with plants, finding effects on germination, growth, and nutrient absorption. The findings raise concerns for human health because crops grown in microplastic-contaminated soil may take up these particles, creating another pathway for microplastics to enter our diet.

Study Type Review

The ubiquitous presence of nanoplastics (NPx) and microplastics (MPx) in the environment has been demonstrated, and as such, the exposure scenarios, mechanisms of plant response, and ultimate risk must be determined. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of the most recent literature investigating the effect of MPx/NPx on plant species under laboratory and field conditions so as to evaluate the current state of knowledge. Effects of MPx/NPx exposure in plants vary as a function of plant species, and interestingly, nonsignificant responses are reported in staple crops. We found that NPx (<100 nm) more negatively affected plant development parameters, photosynthetic pigments, and biochemical indicators than did MPx (>100 nm). Surprisingly, NPx exposure exhibited negligible effects on germination rate, although root morphology was negatively affected. Alternatively, MPx negatively affected (14%) germination and generally exhibited nonsignificant effects on root morphology. The effect of MPx/NPx on plant health decreases with increasing exposure time. No specific trends were evident for the production of biochemical enzymes as related to MPx/NPx concentration or size. Furthermore, we provided a framework for additional investigative work to address the knowledge gaps and to enable accurate assessment of the fate and risk of these materials to environmental and human health.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper