0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Implementation of a structured decision-making framework to evaluate and advance understanding of airborne microplastics

Environmental Science & Policy 2022 8 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Hannah Tiernan, Hannah Tiernan, Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stav Friedman, Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Rebecca K.M. Clube, Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Mark A. Burgman, Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Arturo Castillo Castillo, Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Marc Stettler, Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Sergei G. Kazarian, Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Audrey de Nazelle, Arturo Castillo Castillo, Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright Stephanie Wright

Summary

Researchers used a participatory Structured Decision-Making approach with stakeholders from multiple sectors to define shared objectives and research priorities for airborne microplastics. The process identified human health impacts and the need for interdisciplinary, integrated research approaches as the most urgent priorities in this emerging area.

Microplastic pollution is increasingly recognised as a global environmental challenge which stems from the rapid growth of the use of petrochemical-derived plastic. As researchers and practitioners face a myriad of environmental challenges, oceanic microplastic pollution has so far dominated interest. However, airborne microplastics present an increasing environmental and public health concern. There is currently a need for research addressing this emerging challenge, and at the same time, the lack of knowledge and consensus regarding airborne microplastics presents an obstacle to action. The purpose of this study is to utilise a participatory Structured Decision-Making (SDM) approach to understand the perspectives of a range of stakeholders involved in the microplastics landscape, and subsequently refine common research priorities and knowledge gaps to advance the field. Through two participatory workshops, we first defined shared objectives of stakeholders and then negotiated best courses of action to achieve these objectives based on discussion between stakeholders and facilitators. The qualitative approach taken has enabled the full, complex and multidisciplinary aspects of the research into airborne microplastic pollution to be considered. Our findings highlight some important potential consequences of airborne microplastic pollution, including impacts on human health, and the need for more interdisciplinary research, and collaborative, integrated approaches in this area. As a result of the first workshop, five fundamental objectives on the theme of airborne microplastics were identified. As a direct consequence of this, participants identified 84 actions split across eight themes, which are outlined later in this paper.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper