0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Experimental investigation of inertial fibres and disks in a turbulent boundary layer

Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2022 42 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
L. Baker, L. Baker, Filippo Coletti Filippo Coletti L. Baker, L. Baker, L. Baker, Filippo Coletti Filippo Coletti Filippo Coletti Filippo Coletti Filippo Coletti

Summary

This study investigated the use of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as a capture technology for removing microplastics from water, achieving over 90% removal efficiency for polystyrene and polyethylene particles using an external magnetic field. Recyclability of the sorbent was demonstrated over 10 cycles.

Study Type Environmental

We study experimentally the behaviour of negatively buoyant disks and fibres in a turbulent boundary layer. The regime is relevant to the transport of natural sediment or plastic particles in water, with density ratio $\rho _p/\rho _f \sim O(1)$ , major axis lengths $D_p^+ \sim 50$ , friction Stokes numbers $\mbox { {St}}^+ \sim O(10)$ and friction Reynolds number $\mbox { {Re}}_\tau = 620$ . The translational and rotational motion, as well as concentration and dispersion, are compared with those of spheres of similar inertia. Disks and fibres both oversample high-speed fluid near the wall, in agreement with particle-resolved numerical simulations. Fibres tend to orient mostly in the streamwise direction while disks maintain their symmetry axis quasi-normal to the wall. This alignment is more stable for disks than for fibres: the latter undergo strong tumbling near the wall in response to the mean shear and turbulent fluid velocity fluctuations, whereas the former wobble about their preferential wall-normal orientation. The translational and rotational accelerations indicate that, despite the nominal relaxation times being similar, the disks are slower than the fibres in responding to wall turbulence. For both, wall contact causes strong and intermittent tumbling. The concentration profiles follow Rouse–Prandtl theory over a limited portion of the boundary layer, deviating near the wall and in the outer region. This is largely due to the non-uniform settling velocity, which decreases steeply approaching the wall for all particle types. This is, in turn, a consequence of the reduced particle diffusivity, which closely matches the profile of the eddy viscosity.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper