0
Systematic Review ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 1 ? Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Life cycle assessment in fashion industry: a systematic review

Discover Sustainability 2025 Score: 48 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Komal Dhiwar, Madhura Bedarkar

Summary

This systematic review of life cycle assessments in the fashion industry (2010-2024) found persistent methodological inconsistencies that undermine the reliability of sustainability claims. The review identifies microplastic emissions from textiles as a growing but poorly incorporated impact category, highlighting a gap in understanding the full environmental footprint of clothing.

Study Type Review

The fashion industry exhausts natural resources like fresh water and natural gas while generating significant greenhouse gas emissions and textile waste. This US$1.7 trillion industry is globally fragmented, making environmental impact difficult to quantify. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is one of the key tools for evaluating cradle-to-grave impacts of products, but methodological inconsistencies reduce its reliability as a decision-support instrument. This study conducts a systematic literature review (2010–2024) of peer-reviewed LCAs and industry reports on textiles and apparel, following PRISMA guidelines. The review finds persisting limitations, including limited access to reliable primary and secondary data sets, inconsistent system boundaries and allocation techniques, incomparable functional units, and weak incorporation of growing priorities, including circularity, microplastic emissions, and biodiversity impacts. These impede cross-study comparability and hinder the reliability of sustainability claims. By summarising patterns in LCA practice, the study suggests a research agenda that prioritizes methodological standardization, hybrid attributional-consequential-prospective methodologies, and region-specific inventory datasets. The findings underscore the importance of transparent, traceable, and decision-oriented LCAs in guiding material innovation, circular design strategies, and regulatory compliance.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Review Tier 2

Mapping sustainable options in the fashion industry: A systematic literature review and a future research agenda

This systematic review examined 187 studies on sustainable practices in the fashion industry, which is a major contributor to microplastic pollution through synthetic textiles. Researchers classified sustainable solutions across the purchase, use, and disposal phases of clothing and identified key gaps in current knowledge. The study suggests that addressing fashion industry practices is critical for reducing textile-related microplastic contamination in the environment.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability trends and gaps in the textile, apparel and fashion industries

Researchers conducted a 20-year systematic review of sustainability in the fashion and textile industry, identifying consumer behavior, circular economy practices, and supply chain transparency as the three main research themes. The review highlights that synthetic textile fibers — a major source of microplastic pollution — are embedded in a complex industry that still lacks coherent sustainability standards across its global supply chains.

Article Tier 2

Standards of sustainability in the fashion industry

This review examines sustainability standards in the fashion industry, which accounts for 10% of global carbon emissions, significant water use, and over 85% of textiles going to landfill annually, and explores how washing synthetic clothing releases microplastics into waterways. The authors assess regulatory frameworks, voluntary standards, and the gap between the industry's environmental impact and current sustainability commitments.

Article Tier 2

Modeling marine microplastic emissions in Life Cycle Assessment: characterization factors for biodegradable polymers and their application in a textile case study

Researchers developed new methods for measuring the environmental impact of biodegradable plastic microplastic emissions using life cycle assessment. They found that microplastic degradation rates may be overestimated when based on data from larger plastic pieces, and that microplastic emissions could account for up to 30% of the total environmental impact in a textile case study. The work aims to improve the accuracy of environmental comparisons between conventional and biodegradable materials.

Article Tier 2

The Environmental Impact of the Fashion Industry: The Necessity of Sustainability

This study examines the environmental impact of the fashion industry across six dimensions — carbon emissions, clothing waste and synthetic material pollution, chemical and dye water contamination, water resource consumption, microplastic fiber shedding, and land use — arguing for the necessity of systemic sustainability transitions in fashion production and consumption.

Share this paper