0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Influence of different irrigation methods on the alfalfa rhizosphere soil fungal communities in an arid region

PLoS ONE 2022 13 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Qizhang Deng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Qizhang Deng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yong Wu, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Xiang Zhao, Xiang Zhao, Chengshu Qiu, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Chengshu Qiu, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Shan Xia, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Xiang Zhao, Yuanyuan Feng, Yuanyuan Feng, Hongling Liu

Summary

Researchers examined how traditional flood irrigation versus drip irrigation methods affect fungal diversity, community structures, and ecological functions in alfalfa rhizosphere soils in the arid Xinjiang region of China, finding that irrigation method significantly shapes soil fungal communities.

Xinjiang is the largest arid and saline agricultural region in China. The common irrigation methods in this area are traditional flood irrigation and drip irrigation. In this study, we investigated the effects of these two irrigation methods on the fungal diversity, community structures, and functions in alfalfa rhizosphere soil as well as the associated environmental factors in northern Tianshan Mountain (Xinjiang, China). Soil enzyme activities (urease and neutral phosphatase) were significantly higher in the drip-irrigated alfalfa rhizosphere soil than in the flood-irrigated alfalfa rhizosphere soil, whereas the fungal alpha diversity in the drip-irrigated alfalfa rhizosphere soil was significantly lower than that in the flood-irrigated alfalfa rhizosphere soil. Six dominant fungal phyla were identified (>0.1%), with Ascomycota being the most abundant in all soils, followed by Basidiomycota (5.47%), Mortierellomycota (1.07%), Glomeromycota (0.55%), Rozellomycota (0.27%), and Chytridiomycota (0.14%). Ascomycota and Glomeromycota species were significantly less abundant in drip-irrigated alfalfa rhizosphere soil than in flood-irrigated alfalfa rhizosphere soil. A LEFSe analysis identified Cladosporiaceae (20.8%) species as the most abundant marker fungi in drip-irrigated alfalfa rhizosphere soil. Of the 13 fungal functional groups identified on the basis of the functional annotation using the FUNGuild database, Ectomycorrhizal (22.29%) was the primary functional group. Compared with flood irrigation, drip irrigation significantly decreased the relative abundance of Ectomycorrhizal and Arbuscular_Mycorrhizal, while increasing the relative abundance of Plant_Pathogen, although not significantly (P = 0.19). Available potassium was revealed to be the main environmental factor influencing soil enzyme activities, fungal alpha diversity, fungal community structures, and fungal functions in response to the different irrigation methods. In conclusion, drip irrigation may be more appropriate than flood irrigation in the Tianshan dryland agricultural area for enhancing soil enzyme activities, but it may also increase the abundance of plant pathogenic fungi in the soil.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper