We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Good field practice and hydrogeological knowledge are essential to determine reliable concentrations of microplastics in groundwater
Summary
This commentary identifies methodological weaknesses in a published study on microplastic contamination from an informal landfill, arguing that inadequate descriptions of sampling wells, missing groundwater level and flow direction data, and incomplete sampling procedures make the reported microplastic concentrations in groundwater unreliable.
There are some weaknesses in the methodology of original paper "Informal landfill contributes to the pollution of microplastic in the surrounding environment" published in Environmental Pollution. We commented on the groundwater sampling procedure that affect the calculated concentrations of microplastics in groundwater. Important information related to the description of sampling wells, informal landfill, and the exact description of sample collection method are missing. In addition, significant data related to the groundwater like water level, flow direction, and velocity have been skipped, which are fundamental in groundwater related studies. There should be a clear diagram of landfill location and sampling wells in the landfill, for appropriate understanding of microplastics (MPs) pollution in surrounding environment of a landfill.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Comment on “Spatial distribution of microplastic concentration around landfill sites and its potential risk on groundwater”
This commentary critiques methodological weaknesses in a study of microplastic contamination around landfills, particularly the absence of field blanks and unclear sampling protocols. Rigorous quality assurance is essential for producing reliable microplastic contamination data, especially in environmental monitoring near waste sites.
Comment on the paper “Microplastic contamination of an unconfined groundwater aquifer in Victoria, Australia”
This comment examines methodological problems in a groundwater microplastic study, highlighting that plastic sampling equipment (polyamide ropes, polycarbonate filters) risks contamination, insufficient sample volumes compromise reliability, and Pearson correlation was inappropriately applied without normality testing.
Errors and recommended practices that should be identified to reduce suspected concentrations of microplastics in soil and groundwater: A review
This review analyzed over 185 studies on microplastics in soil and groundwater, identifying widespread methodological errors in sample quantity, quality assurance, identification, and classification, and providing recommendations to improve the reliability of future research in these environments.
Microplastics in Groundwater: Pathways, Occurrence, and Monitoring Challenges
This review provides a comprehensive look at how microplastics make their way into groundwater from surface water, seawater, and soil, and examines the challenges researchers face in detecting and monitoring them. The study found that a lack of standardized sampling and analysis methods makes it difficult to compare findings across different studies. Researchers emphasize the importance of understanding local geological conditions and preventing sample contamination to improve the reliability of groundwater microplastic monitoring.
Occurrence and Sources of Microplastics in groundwater divided by well depth and Hydrogeology in South Korea
Researchers investigated microplastic occurrence in South Korean groundwater stratified by well depth and hydrogeological setting, finding microplastics in wells across all depths and identifying surface connectivity as a key factor controlling contamination levels.