0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Combined three-dimensional flow field measurements and motion tracking of freely moving spheres in a turbulent boundary layer

Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2022 19 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
R. van Hout, R. van Hout, Asaf Hershkovitz, Gerrit E. Elsinga, Jerry Westerweel

Summary

Researchers used time-resolved tomographic particle image velocimetry combined with refractive index matching and machine vision tracking to simultaneously measure the translational and rotational motion of nearly neutrally buoyant hydrogel spheres and the surrounding three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer flow field.

A combination of time-resolved tomographic particle image velocimetry, refractive index matching technique and machine vision algorithms was used to measure the translational and rotational motion of freely moving, nearly neutrally buoyant spheres in a fully developed turbulent boundary layer (TBL). Located in the buffer and logarithmic layers, the hydrogel spheres ( $\sim$ 70 inner wall units in diameter) were refractive index matched with the water and tagged by ‘spokes’. Besides translational motion, the spheres exhibited significant rotation. The spheres were surrounded by typical coherent structures observed in TBLs, among them hairpin packets and transverse and longitudinal vortices that induced ejections and sweeps. While the majority of instantaneous sphere Reynolds numbers did not exceed 100, and vortex shedding was not observed, the results showed that the spheres may affect the evolution of hairpin packets in TBLs due to their finite size. The instantaneous rotation-, wall- and shear-induced lift forces, as well as the drag forces, acting on the spheres were estimated using available correlations for the lift and drag coefficients. Results hinted at negative shear-induced lift due to flow separation at a smaller critical Reynolds number than incorporated in the correlations that do not include the effect of ambient turbulence. The results indicated further that the drag force aided by the rotation-induced lift force was instrumental in keeping one of the spheres aloft. For the wall-ward moving spheres, lift forces opposed sphere motion. As a result, the spheres approached the wall with velocities lower than their quiescent settling velocity.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper