0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

First comparison of sampler surface areas for atmospheric microfibre deposition

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2022 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Alexander Matthew David Finnegan, Rebekah Süsserott, Lip-Hwee Koh, W. B. Teo, Sarah E. Gabbott, Chris Gouramanis

Summary

This study compared atmospheric microfibre deposition rates collected using different sampler surface areas in urban and remote locations. Results tested whether sampler size influences the quantity of anthropogenic microfibres measured, contributing to methodological standardization.

Recent studies have reported on the widespread abundance of atmospheric microplastics (At-MPs) and atmospheric anthropogenic microfibres (At-AMFs) in urban and remote locations. This study sought to test whether there were differences in the quantity of deposited At-AMFs collected when comparing three different surface sampler areas (small: 0.0113 m (Φ = 120 mm), medium: 0.0254 m (Φ = 180 mm) and large: 0.0346 m (Φ = 210 mm)). The analysis revealed no statistically significant variation in the number of At-AMFs recorded, when data was presented in At-AMFs per m day. However, our findings indicate that for any given individual sampling event, the amount of deposition can range by ∼ 150 to 200 At-AMFs m d even if samplers are kept relatively close together. To account for this, we would recommend that future studies collect data in duplicate or triplicate. Our results suggest that data can be compared across different sites and geographical regions-at least if comparing the overall mean and standard deviation of all samples collected. These findings are important because currently there is no standard sampler size for passive collection of At-AMFs and At-MPs.

Share this paper