We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Selection of Suitable Methods for the Detection of Microplastics in the Environment
Summary
This review evaluated and compared methods for sampling and detecting microplastics across different environmental matrices, recommending density separation with high-density solutions like ZnBr2 for best recovery rates and highlighting the importance of selecting methods matched to the specific research context and environment.
Microplastics (MPs) currently cause an environmental risk due to their transport to all components of the environment. The review article aims to evaluate and compare selected methods for the sampling of different matrices and detection of microplastics. To choose suitable sampling methods, the available equipment, goal of research, and kind of environment should be considered. Through the separation of microplastics from samples, NaI and ZnBr2 can provide high recovery rates (99%) and tight error bars. There exist image analysis software and also computer vision based systems (e.g., SMACC) that can be used for the identification, automatic calculation, and classification of MPs in the environment with shorten data calculation time and reduction of human error. Fourier-transform infrared microscopy and Raman spectroscopy were found to be the most appropriate methods for the characterization of MPs.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics everywhere: A review on existing methods of extraction
This review compiled and evaluated existing methods for extracting microplastics from environmental samples, including density separation, oil extraction, and other techniques, assessing their advantages and limitations across different environmental matrices.
Comparison of different salt solutions for density separation of conventional and biodegradable microplastic from solid sample matrices
Researchers compared different salt solutions for separating microplastics from solid environmental samples like sand, soil, and compost. Sodium bromide achieved the highest recovery rates of 87 to 100% for conventional plastics and 38 to 78% for biodegradable plastics, and the study highlights that sample matrix type significantly influences recovery and must be considered when choosing analytical methods.
Extraction of microplastics from sediment matrices: Experimental comparative analysis
Extraction efficiencies of four methods for separating microplastics from sediment matrices were experimentally compared using spiked samples, finding that density separation with saturated NaCl was adequate for most polymer types but underperformed for high-density polymers, and that no single method achieved complete recovery across all particle sizes and shapes.
Not all microplastics are created equal. Quantifying efficacy bias and validation of density separation methods
Researchers evaluated and validated density separation methods for extracting microplastics from environmental matrices, quantifying efficacy bias across different polymer types with varying densities. They found that recovery rates differ substantially depending on polymer density relative to the separation solution, introducing systematic bias in microplastic concentration estimates across studies.
Selection of a density separation solution to study microplastics in tropical riverine sediment
A comparison of density separation solutions for extracting microplastics from tropical riverine sediment found that sodium iodide and zinc chloride achieved higher recovery rates than sodium chloride for dense polymers, but cost and environmental safety concerns favor NaCl for use in developing countries.