0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Evaluation of Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) for the Measurement of Nanoplastics in Drinking Water

2022 9 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Emma Relou, Anna K. Undas Ruud Peters, Anna K. Undas Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Emma Relou, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Emma Relou, Emma Relou, Eelco Sijtsma, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Eelco Sijtsma, Eelco Sijtsma, Eelco Sijtsma, Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Ruud Peters, Anna K. Undas Anna K. Undas

Summary

Researchers evaluated nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) as a method for measuring nanoplastics in drinking water, finding that NTA could detect polystyrene nanoplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations but struggled to discriminate plastic particles from natural organic nanoparticles in real water samples. The authors identified NTA as a useful screening tool requiring complementary chemical identification methods for definitive nanoplastic quantification.

Study Type Environmental

<title>Abstract</title> In the last few years, microplastics have been detected in fresh- and seawater, atmosphere, sediments, soils, sewage sludge, biota and food. However, these microplastics can degrade to even smaller plastic particles in the sub-micron range, the nanoplastics. Only a few studies so far confirmed the presence of NP in environmental samples and their release during the use of personal care products, the boiling of plastic teabags and the use of plastic infant bottles. Due to their smaller dimensions and colloidal properties, nanoplastics could pose an increased hazard to the environment, biota and humans. While there are methods for detecting microplastics, the reliable detection and quantification of size and particle number concentrations of plastic particles less than a micrometre in size are still difficult. In this study, the performance characteristics of nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) for detecting nanoplastics using an NS300 instrument were determined after optimisation. The NS300 proved to be accurate and precise for a 102 nm Nanospheres suspension, showing favourable results for accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility at high and low particle number concentrations. While the concentration range was linear from 5.0x10<sup>6</sup> to 2.0x10<sup>9</sup> particles/mL, the particle size range of the NS300 instrument was linear from 46 to &gt;350 nm. From the measurements of mixtures of particles, it is clear that NTA has difficulties with polydisperse mixtures resulting in an underestimation of the smaller particle sizes. Finally, eight brands of bottled mineral water were analysed. The particle number concentrations ranged from 1.0x10<sup>6</sup> to 2.2x10<sup>7</sup> particles/mL, with mean particle sizes in the range of 110 to 170 nm and mode particle sizes &lt;100 nm for all samples. Particle size distributions showed a particle size range of 50 to 500 nm.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper