We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Implementing a combined Delphi and Focus Group qualitative methodology in Nexus research designs—The case of the WEFE Nexus in Apokoronas, Crete
Summary
Researchers implemented a combined Delphi and Focus Group methodology to study the water-energy-food-ecosystem (WEFE) nexus in a rural Cretan community, demonstrating how qualitative participatory approaches can capture the complex interdependencies in resource management.
In recent years, researchers and policymakers have emphasised the importance of understanding the complex relationships between Water, Energy, Food and Ecosystems (WEFE). The primary reason for capturing these complexities is to understand how decisions made in the water, food and energy sectors can affect one another. Crucially, biodiversity and ecosystem services (E) play a mediating role in these relationships by making material and non-material contributions to all other sectors (W, E, F). The Nexus approach has been widely used for capturing these interdependencies and identifying opportunities for increasing efficiency, reducing trade-offs and building synergies for sustainable resource use across the WEFE nodes. One challenge in using this framework is the need to harmonise the technical and managerial dimensions of the WEFE interlinkages with the perceptions and priorities of local populations directly involved in the use and management of resources. This paper presents a methodological framework that seeks to integrate the perspectives of experts, practitioners and local stakeholders on the WEFE Nexus through the combined application of the Delphi and Focus Group methods. In this paper, the municipality of Apokoronas in Crete, Greece has served as the case in point. The combined framework allowed us to explore the Nexus understanding at the local level and was instrumental in the identification of initiatives for more integrated resource management. The triangulation of results captured the differences in priorities between practitioners and the local community at large, but also, more specifically, it pointed to discrepancies within groups and across WEFE sectors. The outcomes of this paper demonstrate that awareness and learning play a central role in Nexus actions to overcome conflicts and perceived inequalities, and to internalise solutions. The inclusion of the ecosystems node in the traditional WEF Nexus encouraged participants to contemplate the pivotal role of ecosystems in supporting the rest of the WEF sectors.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Analysis of Pros and Cons in Using the Water–Energy–Food Nexus Approach to Assess Resource Security: A Review
This review analyzes the strengths and limitations of using the water-energy-food nexus approach to assess resource security. The study surveys existing research worldwide and identifies gaps in how interconnected resource systems are evaluated, with implications for understanding how environmental pollutants like microplastics affect multiple resource domains simultaneously.
The water-energy-food nexus and COVID-19: Towards a systematization of impacts and responses
Researchers systematically assess COVID-19's impacts across the interlinked water, energy, and food sectors, identifying medicalization of hygiene, production relocalization, and demand fluctuations as major long-term stressors, and argue that the pandemic exposed critical gaps in risk-based planning and cross-border resource integration within the WEF nexus framework.
Caribbean small island developing states must incorporate water quality and quantity in adaptive management of the water-energy-food nexus
This paper is not about microplastics; it addresses water-energy-food nexus management and sustainable water resources in Caribbean Small Island Developing States.
System effects mapping: a tool for promoting collaborative community ecological action
This paper is not about microplastics — it describes a participatory action research method called System Effects Mapping used to build shared understanding among community stakeholders around urban waterway pollution.
Water pollution from food production: lessons for optimistic and optimal solutions
Researchers proposed a multi-pollutant framework for assessing water pollution from food production, drawing lessons from how air quality science handles multiple contaminants simultaneously. The study argues that future water quality assessments should better integrate economic and social goals alongside environmental targets, using participatory approaches to develop practical and politically feasible solutions.