0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Nanoplastics Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Macro- and Microplastics in the Antarctic Environment: Ongoing Assessment and Perspectives

Environments 2022 80 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Roberto Bargagli, Roberto Bargagli, Roberto Bargagli, Emilia Rota, Ilaria Corsi Roberto Bargagli, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Roberto Bargagli, Roberto Bargagli, Ilaria Corsi Roberto Bargagli, Roberto Bargagli, Emilia Rota, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Emilia Rota, Emilia Rota, Emilia Rota, Emilia Rota, Emilia Rota, Emilia Rota, Emilia Rota, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Roberto Bargagli, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Elisa Bergami, Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi Ilaria Corsi

Summary

This review assesses macro- and microplastic contamination in Antarctica, finding that despite environmental protections, coastal areas near research stations and tourist sites show plastic pollution, and calls for standardized monitoring methods to improve data comparability.

Study Type Environmental

The number of scientists and tourists visiting Antarctica is on the rise and, despite the management framework for environmental protection, some coastal areas, particularly in the Antarctic Peninsula region, are affected by plastic contamination. The few data available on the occurrence of microplastics (<5 mm) are difficult to compare, due to the different methodologies used in monitoring studies. However, indications are emerging to guide future research and to implement environmental protocols. In the surface and subsurface waters of the Southern Ocean, plastic debris >300 µm appears to be scarce and far less abundant than paint chips released from research vessels. Yet, near some coastal scientific stations, the fragmentation and degradation of larger plastic items, as well as microbeads and microfibers released into wastewater from personal care products and laundry, could potentially affect marine organisms. Some studies indicate that, through long-range atmospheric transport, plastic fibers produced on other continents can be deposited in Antarctica. Drifting plastic debris can also cross the Polar Front, with the potential to carry alien fouling organisms into the Southern Ocean. Sea ice dynamics appear to favor the uptake of microplastics by ice algae and Antarctic krill, the key species in the Antarctic marine food web. Euphausia superba apparently has the ability to fragment and expel ingested plastic particles at the nanoscale. However, most Antarctic organisms are endemic species, with unique ecophysiological adaptations to extreme environmental conditions and are likely highly sensitive to cumulative stresses caused by climate change, microplastics and other anthropogenic disturbances. Although there is limited evidence to date that micro- and nanoplastics have direct biological effects, our review aims at raising awareness of the problem and, in order to assess the real potential impact of microplastics in Antarctica, underlines the urgency to fill the methodological gaps for their detection in all environmental matrices, and to equip scientific stations and ships with adequate wastewater treatment plants to reduce the release of microfibers.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper