We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Persistent versus transient, and conventional plastic versus biodegradable plastic? —Two key questions about microplastic-water exchange of antibiotic resistance genes
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) exchange between water and floating biodegradable (PBAT) versus non-biodegradable (PET) microplastics, finding that ARG exchange was persistent over time for both polymer types. Biodegradable plastics did not substantially reduce ARG accumulation compared to conventional plastics, suggesting biodegradability alone does not lower the antimicrobial resistance risk of plastic pollution.
The ubiquitous microplastics (MPs) in water environment play an important role in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) due to their exchange between floating MPs and receiving waters. However, whether the ARG exchange is persistent or transient and what are the differences in ARG exchange between conventional plastics and biodegradable plastics are the two key issues to be addressed. In this study, biodegradable PBAT and non-biodegradable PET MPs were chosen to explore the MP-water ARG exchange after the MPs floated to the receiving waters. The results demonstrated that the active exchange of ARGs between MPs and receiving waters occurred, which, however, were transient for most of ARGs. The relative abundance of ARGs both on the MPs and in the waters rapidly decreased to the initial or lower levels within 4 weeks. Approximately 25-50% (ARG subtype number ratio) of studied ARG subtypes were introduced into the receiving waters by MPs, and 35-65% of studied ARG subtypes went through fluctuation in terms of abundance on MPs and in the receiving water. ARGs tended to converge between MPs and the receiving waters with time. Furthermore, the ARG exchange between MPs and waters facilitated horizontal gene transfer (HGT). IntI1 and tnpA05 played the crucial roles in HGT, which was indicated by their correlated change with most ARGs; in contrast, tnpA04 showed the obvious lagging responses. The biodegradable MP of PBAT generally accumulated higher levels of most ARGs including multidrug resistant genes than the non-biodegradable MP of PET. The transient exchange of most ARGs between MPs and water implies that the on-off hitchhiking of ARGs on MPs in aquatic environment may not exert significant influence on ARG transmission. However, compared with the conventional plastics, the biodegradable MPs might pose much higher ARG dissemination risks due to the higher enrichment of ARGs particularly with people's ever-increasingly usage. Enough attention must be paid to this emerging issue.
More Papers Like This
Biodegradable and conventional microplastics as vectors of extracellular ARGs in WWTP effluents: Mechanistic and differential global health risk
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers characterized extracellular antibiotic resistance genes bound to biodegradable and non-biodegradable microplastics in wastewater treatment plant effluents, finding mechanistic differences in how each plastic type associates with resistance gene-carrying DNA and estimating resulting global health risks.
DeterminingAntimicrobial Resistance in the Plastisphere:Lower Risks of Nonbiodegradable vs Higher Risks of Biodegradable Microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers determined the prevalence and diversity of antimicrobial resistance genes in the plastisphere (biofilm on microplastics) compared to surrounding water and sediment, finding that non-biodegradable plastics hosted distinct resistance gene profiles with lower overall resistance risk than biodegradable plastic surfaces.
Biodegradable microplastics amplify antibiotic resistance in aquaculture: A potential One Health crisis from environment to seafood
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tracked antibiotic resistance genes in tilapia aquaculture systems exposed to conventional polypropylene and biodegradable PBAT microplastics over 90 days. They found that both types of microplastics promoted the spread of antibiotic resistance genes, with biodegradable plastics showing comparable or even greater effects. The findings challenge the assumption that biodegradable plastics are safer, suggesting they may similarly amplify antibiotic resistance risks in food production systems.
Plastisphere as a resistome incubator: Substrate biodegradability escalates compounded genetic risks
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that microplastics, especially "biodegradable" ones, can become breeding grounds for bacteria carrying antibiotic resistance genes, sometimes even more than regular plastics. These bacteria also picked up traits that help them spread resistance and cause infections, suggesting that eco-friendly plastics may not be as harmless to health as assumed.
Polymer type and aging drive the selective enrichment of antibiotic resistance genes and pathogens in microplastics biofilms
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers compared how microorganisms colonize conventional polypropylene versus biodegradable polylactic acid microplastics in a wetland environment. They found that while biodegradable PLA attracted fewer total microbes, it actually enriched a higher proportion of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and resistance genes, especially after environmental aging. The findings raise important questions about whether biodegradable plastics may pose unexpected risks as carriers of antibiotic resistance in aquatic ecosystems.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.