We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Man-made natural and regenerated cellulosic fibres greatly outnumber microplastic fibres in the atmosphere
AI summary Read the abstract
Analysis of 33 studies found that man-made cellulosic microfibers are currently 2.5 times more abundant than synthetic (plastic) microfibers in the atmosphere, comprising 57% of all microfibers versus 23% synthetic. However, the proportion of cellulosic fibers is declining while synthetic fibers are increasing, with a projected crossover to synthetic dominance by 2030.
Atmospheric microplastics have been widely reported in studies around the world. Microfibres are often the dominant morphology found by researchers, although synthetic (i.e., plastic) microfibres are typically just a fraction of the total number of microfibres, with other, non-synthetic, cellulosic microfibres frequently being reported. This study set out to review existing literature to determine the relative proportion of cellulosic and synthetic atmospheric anthropogenic (man-made) microfibres, discuss trends in the microfibre abundances, and outline proposed best-practices for future studies. We conducted a systematic review of the existing literature and identified 33 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus and Google Scholar searches that examined cellulosic microfibres and synthetic microfibres in the atmosphere. Multiple analyses indicate that cellulosic microfibres are considerably more common than synthetic microfibres. FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy data obtained from 24 studies, showed that 57% of microfibres were cellulosic and 23% were synthetic. The remaining were either inorganic, or not determined. In total, 20 studies identified more cellulosic microfibres, compared to 11 studies which identified more synthetic microfibres. The data show that cellulosic microfibres are 2.5 times more abundant between 2016 and 2022, however, the proportion of cellulosic microfibres appear to be decreasing, while synthetic microfibres are increasing. We expect a crossover to happen by 2030, where synthetic microfibres will be dominant in the atmosphere. We propose that future studies on atmospheric anthropogenic microfibres should include information on natural and regenerated cellulosic microfibres, and design studies which are inclusive of cellulosic microfibres during analysis and reporting. This will allow researchers to monitor trends in the composition of atmospheric microfibers and will help address the frequent underestimation of cellulosic microfibre abundance in the atmosphere.
More Papers Like This
Chemometric discrimination of airborne fibres: microplastics, regenerated cellulose and natural fibres
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured airborne fiber concentrations across a variety of indoor and outdoor settings and used advanced analytical methods to distinguish between synthetic microplastics, regenerated cellulose, and natural fibers. They found that cellulosic fibers, often overlooked in microplastic surveys, frequently dominated particle counts in many environments. The study highlights the importance of identifying all fiber types in air quality assessments rather than focusing exclusively on synthetic plastics.
Freshwater and airborne textile fibre populations are dominated by ‘natural’, not microplastic, fibres
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers monitoring fibre pollution in a UK river and its surrounding air over twelve months found that natural textile fibres (e.g., cotton, wool) dominated the samples, representing 93.8% of all fibres detected, while synthetic microplastic fibres were entirely absent from more than 80% of samples.
Occurrence of Natural and Synthetic Micro-Fibers in the Mediterranean Sea: A Review
AI summary Read the abstract
This review compiled data on natural and synthetic microfibers in the Mediterranean Sea, finding that cellulosic and regenerated natural fibers often outnumber synthetic plastic fibers at many sampling sites, yet natural fibers are excluded from most microplastic definitions. The authors argued that natural fibers should be included in microplastic monitoring frameworks given their abundance and potential ecological effects.
Microfibers in oceanic surface waters: A global characterization
AI summary Read the abstract
A global analysis of 916 seawater samples from six ocean basins characterized microfibers as ubiquitous contaminants, finding that many are not synthetic textiles but natural or semi-synthetic materials, questioning the assumption that all environmental fibers are microplastic.
Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of microplastics in the environment?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers found synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout collected across a study region, demonstrating that airborne transport is a pathway for microplastic fiber deposition even in areas distant from direct plastic sources.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.