0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

Current Progress in Natural Degradation and Enhanced Removal Techniques of Antibiotics in the Environment: A Review

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022 83 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ying Liu, Shimei Zheng, Yandong Wang, Gang Chen, Cuihong Chen, Gang Chen, Gang Chen, Xiaojing Zhou, Fengxia Yang Ying Liu, Gang Chen, Ying Liu, Ying Liu, Jinmei Yang, Fengxia Yang Cuihong Chen, Yongzhen Ding, Qijin Geng, Qijin Geng, Gang Chen, Gang Chen, Fengxia Yang Yongzhen Ding, Fengxia Yang Yongzhen Ding, Fengxia Yang Yongzhen Ding, Fengxia Yang

Summary

This review summarized natural and enhanced techniques for antibiotic degradation in the environment, finding that while natural processes like photolysis and biodegradation are limited, advanced technologies including biological, chemical, and physicochemical methods show promising removal efficiency.

Antibiotics are used extensively throughout the world and their presence in the environment has caused serious pollution. This review summarizes natural methods and enhanced technologies that have been developed for antibiotic degradation. In the natural environment, antibiotics can be degraded by photolysis, hydrolysis, and biodegradation, but the rate and extent of degradation are limited. Recently, developed enhanced techniques utilize biological, chemical, or physicochemical principles for antibiotic removal. These techniques include traditional biological methods, adsorption methods, membrane treatment, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), constructed wetlands (CWs), microalgae treatment, and microbial electrochemical systems (such as microbial fuel cells, MFCs). These techniques have both advantages and disadvantages and, to overcome disadvantages associated with individual techniques, hybrid techniques have been developed and have shown significant potential for antibiotic removal. Hybrids include combinations of the electrochemical method with AOPs, CWs with MFCs, microalgal treatment with activated sludge, and AOPs with MFCs. Considering the complexity of antibiotic pollution and the characteristics of currently used removal technologies, it is apparent that hybrid methods are better choices for dealing with antibiotic contaminants.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper