0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Predicting Aquaculture Water Quality Using Machine Learning Approaches

Water 2022 68 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Tingting Li, Tingting Li, Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Jun Wu Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Tingting Li, Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Tingting Li, Jian Lü, Jun Wu Jian Lü, Jun Wu Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Jian Lü, Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Tingting Li, Jun Wu Jun Wu Liwei Chen, Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Zhenhua Zhang, Jian Lü, Zhenhua Zhang, Liwei Chen, Jun Wu Jun Wu Jun Wu Jian Lü, Jun Wu Jun Wu

Summary

Researchers compared four machine learning approaches for predicting water quality parameters in industrial aquaculture systems, finding that back propagation and radial basis function neural networks outperformed support vector machine models for most parameters. The models achieved sufficient accuracy to support real-time management decisions without continuous in-situ monitoring.

Body Systems

Good water quality is important for normal production processes in industrial aquaculture. However, in situ or real-time monitoring is generally not available for many aquacultural systems due to relatively high monitoring costs. Therefore, it is necessary to predict water quality parameters in industrial aquaculture systems to obtain useful information for managing production activities. This study used back propagation neural network (BPNN), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), support vector machine (SVM), and least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) to simulate and predict water quality parameters including dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, ammonium-nitrogen (NH3-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), and nitrite-nitrogen (NO2-N). Published data were used to compare the prediction accuracy of different methods. The correlation coefficients of BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM for predicting DO were 0.60, 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively. The correlation coefficients of BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM for predicting pH were 0.56, 0.84, 0.99, and 0.57. The correlation coefficients of BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM for predicting NH3-N were 0.28, 0.88, 0.99, and 0.25, respectively. The correlation coefficients of BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM for predicting NO3-N were 0.96, 0.87, 0.99, and 0.87, respectively. The correlation coefficients of BPNN, RBFNN, SVM, and LSSVM predicted NO2-N with correlation coefficients of 0.87, 0.08, 0.99, and 0.75, respectively. SVM obtained the most accurate and stable prediction results, and SVM was used for predicting the water quality parameters of industrial aquaculture systems with groundwater as the source water. The results showed that the SVM achieved the best prediction effect with accuracy of 99% for both published data and measured data from a typical industrial aquaculture system. The SVM model is recommended for simulating and predicting the water quality in industrial aquaculture systems.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper