We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effect of plastic pollution on freshwater flora: A meta-analysis approach to elucidate the factors influencing plant growth and biochemical markers
AI summary Read the abstract
Meta-analysis of 43 studies found that higher concentrations of micro- and nanoplastics negatively affected aquatic plant growth while increasing protein content and antioxidant enzyme activity as a stress response. Among polymers, PVC most strongly disrupted photosynthetic pigments, and algal species were the most growth-sensitive plant group.
The deterioration in the water quality of urban water bodies through plastic contamination is emerging as a matter of serious concern. Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) both affect the growth and productivity of aquatic flora. However, there have been a lot of variations in the reported studies which calls for revisiting the results with an analytical approach. Therefore, this study was designed to systematically evaluate the publications based on PRISMA (2020) guidelines. In this connection, 43 eligible articles were selected for meta-analysis followed by subgroup analysis to determine the impact of size, concentration, plastic polymers, and effect of plant classes on several physiological and biochemical parameters (growth, chlorophyll-a, carotenoids, protein, and antioxidant enzymes). The results indicated that the higher concentrations of plastics negatively affected the growth, and also enhanced the protein content and antioxidative enzyme activity. While, NPs were found to impart an inhibitory effect on pigment contents, along with a significant increase in protein content and antioxidative enzyme activity. Among the plastic polymers, dibutyl phthalate (DBP) showed a comparatively higher effect on growth, whereas the photosynthetic pigments were disrupted to a greater extent in the presence of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastics. Moreover, the growth parameters under plastic exposure were affected in the algal members to a greater extent in comparison to the other plant groups. Lastly, several plants like Komvophoron, Elodea, Myriophyllum, Nostoc, Raphidocelis, Scenedesmus, Utricularia, Dunaliella, and Lemna appeared to be more tolerant than others (Tolerance Index ≥ 0.8), showing a significantly minimal effect on growth inhibition.
More Papers Like This
Bioavailability and phytotoxicity of micro/nanoplastics to aquatic plants: Trends, environmental drivers and mechanisms
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis found that micro- and nanoplastics cause significant harm to aquatic plants, reducing their biomass and chlorophyll content through oxidative stress. Polyethylene was especially damaging, cutting plant biomass by over 42%. When plastic pollution harms the base of aquatic food chains, the effects can ripple upward through ecosystems that support both wildlife and human food sources.
Unraveling the toxic mechanisms of microplastics in aquatic ecosystem: A case study on Vallisneria natans and Myriophyllum verticillatum
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers exposed two submerged aquatic plant species (Vallisneria natans and Myriophyllum verticillatum) to PVC, polystyrene, and polyethylene microplastics at three concentrations, finding that all three types significantly inhibited photosynthesis and growth and triggered oxidative stress, with effects varying by plastic type and plant species.
Ecotoxicological effects of plastics on plants, soil fauna and microorganisms: A meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
Meta-analysis of 2,936 observations from 140 studies found that plastics caused substantial detrimental effects to plants and soil fauna, but had less impact on microbial diversity. Larger plastics (>1 um) impaired plant growth and germination while nanoplastics primarily increased oxidative stress, and soil fauna reproduction and survival were more adversely affected by smaller particles.
Toxic effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on plants: A global meta-analysis
AI summary Read the abstract
This meta-analysis of 101 studies found that micro- and nanoplastics negatively affect plant physiology, with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) showing the strongest impact on fresh weight, chlorophyll, and reactive oxygen species. Microplastics inhibited most growth and photosynthetic indicators more strongly than nanoplastics, and exposure consistently triggered increased biochemical stress enzyme activity.
Nano- and microplastics commonly cause adverse impacts on plants at environmentally relevant levels: A systematic review
AI summary Read the abstract
Systematic review of 78 studies found that nano- and microplastics commonly cause adverse effects on plants even at environmentally relevant concentrations, with germination and root growth more strongly affected than shoot growth during early development. Chlorophyll levels were consistently reduced while stress indicators (ROS) and antioxidant enzymes were consistently upregulated across species.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.