0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Quantification and characterization of additives, plasticizers, and small microplastics (5–100 μm) in highway stormwater runoff

Journal of Environmental Management 2022 48 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Beatrice Rosso, Fabiana Corami, Luca Vezzaro, Stefano Biondi, Barbara Bravo, Carlo Barbante, Andrea Gambaro

Summary

Small microplastics (5-100 micrometers), plastic additives, and plasticizers were quantified in highway stormwater runoff samples using micro-FTIR and optimized extraction protocols. Small microplastics dominated by number, with rubber fragments and tire-wear particles prominent, and concentrations varied significantly between rainfall events based on road traffic intensity and antecedent dry period.

Highway stormwater (HSW) runoff is a significant pathway for transferring microplastics from land-based sources to the other surrounding environmental compartments. Small microplastics (SMPs, 5-100 μm), additives, plasticizers, natural, and nonplastic synthetic fibers, together with other components of micro-litter (APFs), were assessed in HSW samples via Micro-FTIR; oleo-extraction and purification procedures previously developed were optimized to accomplish this goal. The distribution of SMPs and APFs observed in distinct HSW runoff varied significantly since rainfall events may play a crucial role in the concentration and distribution of these pollutants. The SMPs' abundance varied from 11932 ± 151 to 18966 ± 191 SMPs/L. The dominating polymers were vinyl ester (VE), polyamide 6 (PA6), fluorocarbon, and polyester (PES). The APFs' concentrations ranged from 12825 ± 157 to 96425 ± 430 APFs/L. Most APFs originated from vehicle and tire wear (e.g., Dioctyl adipate or 5-Methyl-1H-benzotriazole). Other sources of these pollutants might be pipes, highway signs, packaging from garbage debris, road marking paints, atmospheric deposition, and other inputs. Assessing SMPs in HSW runoff can help evaluating the potential threat they may represent to receiving water bodies and air compartments. Besides, APFs in HSW runoff may be efficient proxies of macro- and microplastic pollution.

Share this paper