We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Experiences and consequences of phasing out substances of concern in a multinational healthcare company
Summary
A multinational healthcare company reported on its decade-long program to phase out substances of very high concern from all products globally, as committed in 2015 following European REACH regulations. The authors shared practical challenges including supply chain complexity and lack of safe alternatives, and provided a framework for how other large companies could approach similar programs.
Abstract Background In 2015, one of the largest healthcare companies in the world committed to phasing out from all its products and processes worldwide any substances declared by the European Chemicals Agency to be of very high concern. Since then, extended practical experience was gained in the phasing out of substances of concern. Results We report in detail on a company-wide programme to phase out substances of concern, the challenges of and the approaches to the phase-out. The paper provides concrete ideas of how to address the legitimate urge to remove substances of concern from economic activities in a holistic way, taking into account the broad diversity of aspects of sustainability. The present paper also reviews the regulatory and societal environment in which substances of concern are being phased out. The paper attempts to contribute to the ongoing discussion of how to improve the chemicals policy in Europe and beyond. Conclusions Phasing out substances of concern, substance selection for new products and processes, and the avoidance of regrettable substitutions while maintaining the pace of genuine innovation will stay a major challenge for our industry in the years ahead whereby not only toxicological and ecotoxicological hazards have to be considered in the selection and deselection of substances, but also other sustainability criteria characterising the entire life cycle will play an increasingly important role. Legislators and industry need to pay more attention to how this is implemented while avoiding slowing down innovation, making essential products unnecessarily more expensive, and further pushing material production out of highly regulated countries.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Strategies for Dealing with Substances of Concern in Product Design – a Review of Five Cases
This review examined design strategies for dealing with substances of concern in products, covering approaches to substitute, minimize, or eliminate hazardous chemicals throughout the product lifecycle. The authors identified regulatory frameworks and practical design tools to guide manufacturers toward safer material choices.
DataRequirements for Implementing the “Essential-Use”Concept in Chemical Legislation
Researchers examined the data requirements needed to implement the 'essential-use' concept within the Stockholm Convention and EU REACH Regulation chemical legislation frameworks. The study analyzed what types of substance-specific data would be necessary to determine whether a chemical's uses qualify as essential, informing proposed revisions to global and European chemical governance.
DataRequirements for Implementing the “Essential-Use”Concept in Chemical Legislation
Researchers examined the data requirements needed to implement the 'essential-use' concept within the Stockholm Convention and EU REACH Regulation chemical legislation frameworks. The study analyzed what types of substance-specific data would be necessary to determine whether a chemical's uses qualify as essential, informing proposed revisions to global and European chemical governance.
Characterisation and analysis of key studies used to restrict substances under REACH
Researchers analyzed key studies cited in REACH (European chemicals regulation) substance restriction dossiers, evaluating how well the selected studies reflect the full evidence base for regulated contaminants. The analysis found that dossiers sometimes relied on a narrow subset of available studies, with implications for the robustness of regulatory decisions.
Legacy additives in a circular economy of plastics: Current dilemma, policy analysis, and emerging countermeasures
This review examines the problem of 'legacy additives' in plastic waste — formerly used substances such as certain flame retardants, stabilizers, and plasticizers now classified as substances of very high concern or persistent organic pollutants — and analyzes the policy and practical challenges they pose for circular economy recycling and reuse systems. The authors evaluate emerging countermeasures to prevent legacy additive contamination from re-entering product supply chains.