0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Remediation Sign in to save

A Qualitative Approach to the Seismic Estimation of Wastewater Treatment Plants and Potential Impacts on the Hydrosphere

Water 2022 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Ploutarchos N. Kerpelis, Dimitrios Ε. Alexakis, Spyridon K. Golfinopoulos

Summary

A qualitative method using expert questionnaires was developed to rapidly assess the seismic vulnerability of wastewater treatment plants, which are critical infrastructure that could release pollutants during earthquakes. The method identifies high-risk facilities that may require physical reinforcement. Protecting wastewater plants from seismic damage is important for preventing environmental contamination during disasters.

Study Type Environmental

Many quantitative and qualitative methods have been developed to estimate the seismic vulnerability of Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs). The research approach using questionnaires is the most common qualitative process to quickly access estimation results. In the present study, the Experts’ Judgment method was implemented. A representative questionnaire was distributed to a hundred and sixteen (116) operators of Greece’s WWTPs according to proportional stratified sampling for seven months. The questionnaire was based on the main parameters that contribute to seismic vulnerability (structural, non-structural and operational matters). The examination of the results included the search for reliability and validity. Their collection also revealed that the average seismic vulnerability of the samples was found at a low level after a direct question, and was slightly increased after analyzing a group of questions. In the case of soil–water pollution during the post-seismic period, the answers showed low percentages for the contribution to the seismic vulnerability (at the partial mode), and divided answers existed at low and slightly increased percentages. Non-structural and operational vulnerability somewhat increased the percentages in the judgments. During the 24 h post-seismic period, the possibility of soil–water pollution was expected at low percentages and it remained constant. The results of this study could be compared to future surveys for qualitative approaches to disaster risks or could be used in addition to the results from quantitative methods.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Beyond Treatment: Building Pandemic-Resilient Wastewater Systems for Public Health

This qualitative review examined how pandemics stress wastewater infrastructure, identifying increased volumes, changing contaminant profiles, and workforce challenges as key vulnerabilities, and recommending design and policy changes to build more resilient systems.

Article Tier 2

Sustainability assessment of retrofitting alternatives for large and old wastewater treatment plants in Seoul

Researchers applied an analytic hierarchy process with input from 14 experts to develop evaluation criteria for selecting the most sustainable retrofitting alternatives for a large, aging wastewater treatment plant (1.6 M m3/day capacity) in Seoul, comparing three retrofitting scenarios to inform long-term environmental sustainability planning.

Article Tier 2

The reliability of evaporation ponds as a final basin for industrial effluent: Demonstration of an environmental risk management methodology

Researchers developed a new environmental risk assessment method for industrial evaporation ponds, which are used to store wastewater from power plants and factories. Their analysis found that contaminants in these ponds become more concentrated over time due to evaporation, creating measurable ecological risks that industries need to manage more carefully.

Article Tier 2

The choice of a method for selecting and determining the quantitative and qualitative content of microplastics in wastewater

Researchers developed and validated a methodology for sampling, quantifying, and qualitatively analyzing microplastics in wastewater collected from infrastructure sites in Rostov-on-Don and Aksai, Russia, confirming the presence of urban-generated microplastic particles at all locations.

Article Tier 2

What Determines the Future Ecological Risks of Wastewater Discharges in River Networks: Load, Location or Climate Change?

Researchers developed a systematic framework for assessing future ecological risks from wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents in river networks by combining plant size class as a proxy for pollutant load with stream order as a proxy for discharge location, applying it under climate change scenarios to show that streamflow reduction in receiving rivers will significantly worsen ecological risk even without increases in pollutant loads.

Share this paper