0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Physical-Chemical Characterization of Different Carbon-Based Sorbents for Environmental Applications

Materials 2022 28 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Simone Marzeddu, Agostina Chiavola, María Alejandra Décima, Agostina Chiavola, Luca Camilli, Agostina Chiavola, Maria Rosaria Boni Maria Rosaria Boni Maria Paola Bracciale, Virgilio Genova, Laura Paglia, Maria Rosaria Boni Francesco Marra, Maria Rosaria Boni Martina Damizia, Agostina Chiavola, Agostina Chiavola, Marco Stoller, Agostina Chiavola, Maria Rosaria Boni Maria Rosaria Boni

Summary

Researchers characterized and compared the physical-chemical properties of activated carbon and two biochars for environmental remediation applications, finding that the biochars offer comparable performance to activated carbon while providing a lower-cost circular economy alternative derived from waste pyrolysis.

Study Type Environmental

Biochar has been used in various applications, e.g., as a soil conditioner and in remediation of contaminated water, wastewater, and gaseous emissions. In the latter application, biochar was shown to be a suitable alternative to activated carbon, providing high treatment efficiency. Since biochar is a by-product of waste pyrolysis, its use allows for compliance with circular economics. Thus, this research aims to obtain a detailed characterization of three carbonaceous materials: an activated carbon (CARBOSORB NC 1240<sup>®</sup>) and two biochars (RE-CHAR<sup>®</sup> and AMBIOTON<sup>®</sup>). In particular, the objective of this work is to compare the properties of three carbonaceous materials to evaluate whether the application of the two biochars is the same as that of activated carbon. The characterization included, among others, particle size distribution, elemental analysis, pH, scanning electron microscope, pore volume, specific surface area, and ionic exchange capacity. The results showed that CARBOSORB NC 1240<sup>®</sup> presented a higher specific surface (1126.64 m<sup>2</sup>/g) than AMBIOTON<sup>®</sup> (256.23 m<sup>2</sup>/g) and RE-CHAR<sup>®</sup> (280.25 m<sup>2</sup>/g). Both biochar and activated carbon belong to the category of mesoporous media, showing a pore size between 2 and 50 nm (20-500 Å). Moreover, the chemical composition analysis shows similar C, H, and N composition in the three carbonaceous materials while a higher O composition in RE-CHAR<sup>®</sup> (9.9%) than in CARBOSORB NC 1240 <sup>®</sup> (2.67%) and AMBIOTON<sup>®</sup> (1.10%). Differences in physical and chemical properties are determined by the feedstock and pyrolysis or gasification temperature. The results obtained allowed to compare the selected materials among each other and with other carbonaceous adsorbents.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper