We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Potential Artifacts and Control Experiments in Toxicity Tests of Nanoplastic and Microplastic Particles
AI summary Read the abstract
This review highlighted potential measurement artifacts and the importance of proper control experiments in toxicity studies of nanoplastics and microplastics. The study cautions that antimicrobials, surfactants, and other additives present in commercial plastic particle dispersions may account for observed toxic effects rather than the particles themselves, emphasizing the need for rigorous experimental design in microplastic toxicology research.
To fully understand the potential ecological and human health risks from nanoplastics and microplastics (NMPs) in the environment, it is critical to make accurate measurements. Similar to past research on the toxicology of engineered nanomaterials, a broad range of measurement artifacts and biases are possible when testing their potential toxicity. For example, antimicrobials and surfactants may be present in commercially available NMP dispersions, and these compounds may account for toxicity observed instead of being caused by exposure to the NMP particles. Therefore, control measurements are needed to assess potential artifacts, and revisions to the protocol may be needed to eliminate or reduce the artifacts. In this paper, we comprehensively review and suggest a next generation of control experiments to identify measurement artifacts and biases that can occur while performing NMP toxicity experiments. This review covers the broad range of potential NMP toxicological experiments, such as in vitro studies with a single cell type or complex 3-D tissue constructs, in vivo mammalian studies, and ecotoxicity experiments testing pelagic, sediment, and soil organisms. Incorporation of these control experiments can reduce the likelihood of false positive and false negative results and more accurately elucidate the potential ecological and human health risks of NMPs.
More Papers Like This
Microplastics and nanoplastics: Size, surface and dispersant – What causes the effect?
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed how the size, surface properties, and dispersants of micro- and nanoplastic particles influence their toxic effects. They found that smaller particles and certain surface modifications can significantly alter toxicity, and that dispersants used in laboratory studies may introduce confounding effects. The study emphasizes the need for standardized testing protocols that account for these variables to accurately assess plastic particle risks to human health.
Materials, surfaces, and interfacial phenomena in nanoplastics toxicology research
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines how the materials and surface properties of engineered nanoplastics used in toxicology research may not accurately represent real environmental nanoplastics. Researchers found that surfactants, fluorescent labels, and surface modifications commonly applied to lab-made nanoparticles can alter their toxicological profiles in unpredictable ways. The study calls for greater attention to how particle surface chemistry and preparation methods influence experimental outcomes in nanoplastics safety research.
The tox is in the detail: technical fundamentals for designing, performing, and interpreting experiments on toxicity of microplastics and associated substances
AI summary Read the abstract
This review addresses the technical fundamentals of microplastic toxicity experiments for non-chemist researchers, explaining sorption principles, how pollutants interact with plastic particles, and how experimental design choices affect the relevance of results. It argues that many published studies use unrealistic conditions that overestimate or distort the chemical hazard of microplastics.
Toxicity Assessments of Micro- and Nanoplastics Can Be Confounded by Preservatives in Commercial Formulations
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers discovered that preservatives commonly found in commercial polystyrene particle formulations, such as sodium azide, can significantly skew toxicity results in micro- and nanoplastic studies. The study suggests that many published findings on plastic toxicity may be confounded by these chemical additives rather than reflecting the effects of the plastic particles themselves.
Confounding factors in nano and microplastic ecological risk assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
This review identified and discussed the major confounding factors in micro- and nanoplastic ecotoxicology research, including particle variability, contamination during testing, and inconsistent methodology. The authors highlighted how these confounders lead to discrepancies across studies and outlined best practices for improving data quality and comparability.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.