We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Reconciling the actual and nominal exposure concentrations of microplastics in aqueous phase: Implications for risk assessment and deviation control
Summary
Researchers analyzed 210 published microplastic exposure experiments and found that nearly 40% had actual particle concentrations deviating more than 20% from their stated nominal values, with particle size identified as the key factor driving inaccuracy, and proposed correction approaches to improve risk assessment reliability.
The deviation between actual and nominal concentrations of microplastics (MPs), as a long-standing issue, has been critically commented. However, there is still a lack of quantitative assessment and reconciling practice on the deviation. In this study, a total of 210 deviations were recompiled to thoroughly examine this issue. It was shown that up to 81 (39%) deviations exceeded the recommended ± 20% variation specification, highlighting that the deviation of MPs should not be neglected. This study attempted to reconcile the deviation based on the most prominent driving factors. Specifically, the game theory-based SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm identified that the particle size was the most important factor affecting the deviation. Subsequently, at each size magnitude, a significant linear correlation between the logarithmic actual and nominal concentrations was determined, which provided a sound basis for estimating the actual concentration from the nominal one. Furthermore, deviations of different size classes were simulated through 10, 000 points, suggesting that the ± 20% deviation variation could be well maintained within a specific concentration range. Moreover, the potential interaction effects between factors were quantified by SHAP interaction values, with more detailed conversion bases proposed. Additionally, several control measures were recommended to reduce the deviation of MPs.