0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

When did post-truth begin? From climate change denial to war-mongering nationalism

2022 1 citation ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Daniele Conversi

Summary

This article argues that the media infrastructure built around climate change denial in the 2000s -- culminating around the 2009 Copenhagen agreement -- was foundational to the subsequent systematic spread of post-truth rhetoric and fake news, with implications for how misinformation undermines social trust across health, politics, and environmental governance.

This article argues that the media structure created by the framework of climate denial in the 2000s was foundational in the subsequent SYSTEMATIC use and DIFFUSION of FAKE NEWS and ‘post-truth’, culminating around the Copenhagen agreement in 2009. The article therefore places the negation of climate change at the roots of the persisting appeal of fake news. The shell-shocking discovery that fake news travels much further, and faster, than real news (Vosoughi, Roy et al. 2018) has thus deeper social, political, economic, health, medical, and life-changing implications than everything else that has been said about these fields taken together: All societies are based on TRUST and the circulation of reliable information. If systematic misinformation prevails, societies tend to break down at various levels, from the individual to the national and the supranational. On the other hand, few have speculated on how the phenomenon was shaped by nationalist ideology, even though it was clearly identified as originating from far-right agendas. I therefore argue that two variables must be jointly investigated to explain the appearance of nebulous post-truth politics: the denial of climate change and state-led nationalism, the former supported by the latter. Thus, the origin of post-truth needs to be connected to the campaign of misinformation initiated with climate change denial around the Copenhagen accord — and, earlier in the USA. This approach brings us nearer to finding a series of solutions for rebuilding public trust: if trust in science is not promptly re-established, then the very basis of modern societies can easily collapse bringing down with them everyone else.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Networks of climate obstruction: Discourses of denial and delay in US fossil energy, plastic, and agrichemical industries

Researchers analyzed social media activity from major US fossil fuel, plastics, and agrichemical corporations to map how these industries coordinate messaging that delays climate and environmental action. The study found shared narratives across all three sectors that promote continued fossil fuel extraction, with implications for how policymakers understand and counter organized opposition to environmental regulation.

Article Tier 2

Evolution of Media Coverage on Climate Change and Environmental Awareness: An Analysis of Tweets from UK and US Newspapers

Researchers analyzed a decade of climate change tweets from six major UK and US newspapers, finding that coverage increased overall but dipped sharply during the COVID-19 pandemic before recovering by 2021, with 2019 standing out as a pivotal year driven by the Fridays for Future movement. Topic modeling revealed recurring themes around politics, health impacts, and pollution.

Article Tier 2

Introduction

This introduction frames an anthology examining how media across journalistic and digital platforms represent scientific facts and contested truths in domains including climate change, environmental pollution, and science communication. The editors outline the anthology's coverage of misinformation, conspiracy theories, expert authority, and the role of political actors in shaping or contesting public understanding of science.

Article Tier 2

Conclusion

This concluding chapter synthesizes the anthology's findings on how both knowledge and counter-knowledge discourses are constructed through media logic across different outlets, showing how news media both reinforce and contest institutional science positions in ongoing public negotiations about trust in expertise. The chapter emphasizes that even in polarized media environments, including social media, discursive contestation of scientific authority follows structured patterns tied to specific media forms.

Article Tier 2

A bibliometric analysis of climate change risk perception: Hot spots, trends and improvements

A bibliometric analysis of 4,429 articles on climate change risk perception identified major research themes, leading authors, institutions, and trending topics from 1990 to the present. The analysis showed rapid growth in this field after 2015 and identified gaps in research from lower-income countries and on social media-mediated risk communication.

Share this paper