Systematic Review
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 1
?
Systematic review or meta-analysis. Synthesizes findings across many studies. Strongest evidence.
Environmental Sources
Policy & Risk
Sign in to save
How environmental regulation can drive innovation: Lessons learned from a systematic review
Environmental Policy and Governance2022
11 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 45
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen,
Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen,
Maria Bille Nielsen,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen,
Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen,
Maria Bille Nielsen,
Maria Bille Nielsen,
Maria Bille Nielsen,
Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen,
Maria Bille Nielsen,
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Nikoline Bang Oturai,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Maria Bille Nielsen,
Maria Bille Nielsen,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Lauge Peter Westergaard Clausen,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Kristian Syberg
Steffen Foss Hansen,
Kristian Syberg
Summary
This systematic review distilled ten lessons for designing environmental regulation that drives rather than hinders innovation. Well-designed regulations — especially those that are technology-neutral, predictable, and stringent enough to push beyond incremental improvement — can stimulate breakthrough environmental technologies including plastic alternatives.
Study Type
Review
Abstract Regulation is often seen as a barrier to innovation. However, if done properly, it can actually serve as a driver of innovation. To understand how environmental regulation can be designed to stimulate innovation, we scrutinise the scientific literature related to regulation, innovation and the environment. Fifty one carefully selected studies are examined with regard to their scope, results and geographical affiliation, and their findings were distilled into ten lessons on how to design environmental regulation to stimulate innovation. Subsequently, we discuss the validity and implications of the lessons. We find that the lessons are overarching concepts of principal nature that are applicable for most regulatory settings. We also find that recent EU regulations on plastics, nanomaterials and waste support many of the lessons learned, while some are completely neglected. The lessons offer important guidance and can be seen as a checklist of what regulators must consider when designing new regulation.