0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Remediation Sign in to save

Effect of Nosema apis and N. ceranae on honey bee Apis mellifera queen development

Acta morphologica et anthropologica 2022 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Sigmar Naudi, Risto Raimets, Margret Jürison, Egle Liiskmann, Marika Mänd, Delka Salkova, Reet Karise

Summary

Researchers experimentally infected royal jelly in queen cells with Nosema apis and N. ceranae spores at high and low concentrations and mixed combinations to assess effects on honey bee queen development across seven treatment groups. The study examined how nosemosis-causing microsporidian parasites impact queen developmental outcomes, addressing a knowledge gap in understanding disease effects on reproductive castes.

Nosema apis and N. ceranae are agents causing the disease called nosemosis in honey bee workers and queens. Few is known about the impacts of it on honey bee development. The royal jelly in queen cells was infected with Nosema spores to see whether and how it affects the development of honey bee queens. Seven groups of grafted honey bee larvae were established, and treated as follows: high and low concentrations of N. ceranae and N. apis, mixes of both species in both concentrations, and untreated control. After allowing nurse bees to fill the queen cells with royal jelly, an injection of 50 000 spores or 10 000 spores was added into the royal jelly. We found that only N. apis decreased the hatching rate of honey bee queens both in single and mixed treatment at high dosages, but we did not detect any morphological deviations in unhatched pupae.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Systematic Review Tier 1

A systematic review of honey bee (Apis mellifera, Linnaeus, 1758) infections and available treatment options

This systematic review catalogued the major pathogens threatening honey bee colonies worldwide, including Varroa mites, Nosema fungi, and several viruses, along with current treatment options. The authors call for a global monitoring system to track parasite prevalence and protect pollinator health.

Article Tier 2

Influence of Age of Infection on the Gut Microbiota in Worker Honey Bees (Apis mellifera iberiensis) Experimentally Infected with Nosema ceranae

Researchers studied how infection with the gut parasite Nosema ceranae affects the microbiome of honey bees at different ages. The study found that infected bees, especially those infected shortly after emerging, showed significant shifts in their gut bacteria populations, suggesting that both age and infection timing play important roles in how bee gut health is disrupted.

Article Tier 2

Insights into the Role of Natural Products in the Control of the Honey Bee Gut Parasite (Nosema spp.)

This review examined the potential of natural products including plant extracts, essential oils, and organic acids as alternatives to pharmaceutical treatments against the honey bee gut parasite Nosema spp. Several natural compounds showed anti-Nosema activity in laboratory studies, but field efficacy and safe application protocols remain incompletely characterized.

Article Tier 2

Assessing the effects of a commercial fungicide and an herbicide, alone and in combination, on Apis mellifera: Insights from biomarkers and cognitive analysis

Researchers tested the combined effects of a commercial fungicide and herbicide on honey bees and found that the mixture was more harmful than either chemical alone. The pesticide combination impaired the bees' cognitive abilities, disrupted detoxification enzymes, and increased oxidative stress markers. The study suggests that current risk assessments, which typically evaluate pesticides individually, may underestimate the real-world dangers bees face from chemical mixtures.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic ingestion and co-exposure to Nosema ceranae and flupyradifurone reduce the survival of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)

Researchers studied the combined effects of microplastics, the insecticide flupyradifurone, and the gut parasite Nosema ceranae on honey bee health. They found that all treatments reduced bee survival compared to controls, with the three-way combination being the most harmful, and that microplastics and the pesticide increased parasite reproduction. The study suggests that microplastics may worsen the effects of other stressors on bee health, compounding existing threats to pollinators.

Share this paper