0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Nanoplastics Sign in to save

Contact LineIce Nucleation Is the Dominant FreezingMechanism for Water on Macro- and Microscopic Polypropylene Surfaces

Figshare 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Paul Bieber (19461094), Teresa M. Seifried (18296566), William Bae (22631930), Allan K. Bertram (1277880), Nadine Borduas-Dedekind (6334124)

Summary

Researchers investigated the dominant mechanism of ice nucleation on polypropylene surfaces, determining that freezing initiates at the plastic-water-air contact line rather than the bulk plastic-water interface, with potential implications for atmospheric cloud physics involving micro- and nanoplastics.

Polymers

Ice nucleation on hydrophobic surfaces induces aircraft and wind turbine icing, the freezing of water in cryo-preservation, and atmospheric ice formation on micro- and nanoplastics. Yet, predicting the freezing mechanisms and temperatures for hydrophobic materials, such as plastics, remains difficult without understanding if freezing initiates at the plastic–water interface or at the plastic–water–air contact line. Here, we investigated the freezing of water droplets on macroscopic and microscopic polypropylene plastics to characterize their ice nucleation onset locations. First, the onset locations of freezing were measured with a high-speed camera (≥2100 frames per second) to differentiate between freezing initiating at the plastic–water interface and freezing initiating at the plastic–water–air contact line. Freezing at the contact line was the dominant mechanism for 10 μL droplets on flat polypropylene sheets, with ice nucleation observed at the contact line in 90% of the cases. Second, we investigated the change in the contact angles of the droplets during a cooling cycle. Interestingly, the contact angles decreased with cooling under a N2 flow by up to 6.6°, suggesting a pinned contact line. This pinned contact line and the associated negative pressure at the contact line could have played a role in the freezing mechanism. Third, we analyzed polypropylene fibers in contact with 1 μL and 5 nL droplets and found that contact line nucleation dominated. For example, 5 nL droplets condensed onto polypropylene microfibers nucleated ice at the contact line 3.5 times more often than at the fiber–water interface. Overall, our measurements demonstrated that polypropylene sheets and fibers had a clear preference for initiating freezing at the three-phase contact line. As a consequence, understanding the thermodynamics governing the contact line might enable predictive capabilities of the freezing temperatures for plastic materials and other hydrophobic surfaces.

Share this paper