0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Field measurements reveal exposure risk to microplastic ingestion by filter-feeding megafauna

Nature Communications 2022 105 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 60 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca Shirel R. Kahane‐Rapport, Elliott L. Hazen, Shirel R. Kahane‐Rapport, Max F. Czapanskiy, Shirel R. Kahane‐Rapport, Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca Elliott L. Hazen, James A. Fahlbusch, Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca Elliott L. Hazen, Jeremy A. Goldbogen, Ari S. Friedlaender, Jeremy A. Goldbogen, Matthew S. Savoca John Calambokidis, Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca Elliott L. Hazen, Jeremy A. Goldbogen, Ari S. Friedlaender, Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca Matthew S. Savoca

Summary

Researchers combined ocean microplastic data with high-resolution whale feeding measurements to estimate how much plastic blue, fin, and humpback whales ingest in the California Current Ecosystem. They found that whales likely consume millions of microplastic particles per day, primarily through contaminated prey rather than direct filtration of water. The study reveals that filter-feeding whales face far greater microplastic exposure than previously estimated.

Microparticles, such as microplastics and microfibers, are ubiquitous in marine food webs. Filter-feeding megafauna may be at extreme risk of exposure to microplastics, but neither the amount nor pathway of microplastic ingestion are well understood. Here, we combine depth-integrated microplastic data from the California Current Ecosystem with high-resolution foraging measurements from 191 tag deployments on blue, fin, and humpback whales to quantify plastic ingestion rates and routes of exposure. We find that baleen whales predominantly feed at depths of 50-250 m, coinciding with the highest measured microplastic concentrations in the pelagic ecosystem. Nearly all (99%) microplastic ingestion is predicted to occur via trophic transfer. We predict that fish-feeding whales are less exposed to microplastic ingestion than krill-feeding whales. Per day, a krill-obligate blue whale may ingest 10 million pieces of microplastic, while a fish-feeding humpback whale likely ingests 200,000 pieces of microplastic. For species struggling to recover from historical whaling alongside other anthropogenic pressures, our findings suggest that the cumulative impacts of multiple stressors require further attention.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper