0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Food & Water Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Ecotoxicological Assessment of “Glitter” Leachates in Aquatic Ecosystems: An Integrated Approach

Toxics 2022 19 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Leachates from nine types of commercial glitter were tested for toxicity in freshwater and saltwater model organisms across three soak periods up to 180 days. Photosynthesizing primary producers were most sensitive to glitter leachates, with some formulations causing significant growth inhibition, raising ecotoxicological concerns about this largely overlooked microplastic category.

Models
Study Type Environmental

The most worrisome fraction within plastic pollution is that of microplastics (MP). A category of MP almost completely ignored is that of glitter. The objective of this study is to test the toxicity of nine types of glitter leachate (3 soak times: 3, 90 and 180 days) on model organisms in freshwater (Allivibrio fischeri, Raphidocelis subcapitata, Daphnia magna) and saltwater (Allivibrio fischeri, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Paracentrotus lividus). An integrated approach was applied to obtain the percentage of ecotoxicological risk. The results show that (i) photosynthesizing primary producers are the most sensitive trophic level; (ii) algae transitioned from growth inhibition to biostimulation; (iii) D. magna showed higher sensitivity after 48 h compared to 24 h; (iv) A. fischeri responded more strongly in saltwater than in freshwater. The integrated data show a greater risk associated with the marine environment, with the highest risk for glitters that are hexagonal and composed of poly-methyl-methacrylate. Our multivariate analysis shows that the toxicity of plastic leaching is a complex phenomenon that depends on the sensitivity of the species, in some cases on the soaking time and on the medium, and is not clearly linked to the polymer type, the contact area or the colors of the particles.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

All that glitters is litter? Ecological impacts of conventional versus biodegradable glitter in a freshwater habitat.

AI summary Read the abstract

A mesocosm experiment compared the effects of conventional PET glitter versus biodegradable alternatives (including modified cellulose and mica) on freshwater ecosystems, finding no significant effect on biodiversity but a reduction in algae photosynthesis from conventional glitter. The results suggest biodegradable glitter alternatives may be less harmful, though the effects of both types at higher concentrations or over longer periods remain unclear.

Article Tier 2

Stealth microplastics pollutants: Toxicological evaluation of polyethylene terephthalate-based glitters on the microalga Desmodesmus sp. and its color effect

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers found that PET-based glitter microplastics and their chemical leachates are toxic to the microalga Desmodesmus, with toxicity varying by glitter color, highlighting glitter as an overlooked source of primary microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

A Glow before Darkness: Toxicity of Glitter Particles to Marine Invertebrates

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated the toxicity of glitter microplastic particles on marine invertebrate embryos, finding that both green and white glitter types caused developmental abnormalities in sea urchins and mussels, partly due to chemical leachates.

Article Tier 2

Physical and chemical impacts of conventional plastic versus biodegradable glitters on freshwater primary producers

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the effects of conventional PET glitter and two types of biodegradable glitter on algae, separating the physical presence of the particles from the chemical effects of what leaches into the water. While conventional plastic glitter caused physical harm, both types of glitter released leachates that affected algal physiology. The study shows that replacing traditional microplastics with biodegradable alternatives does not necessarily eliminate all environmental risks.

Article Tier 2

Investigating on the toxicity and bio-magnification potential of synthetic glitters on Artemia salina

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers assessed the toxic effects of polyethylene terephthalate glitter microplastics on Artemia salina (brine shrimp) as a model zooplankton species. The study found that glitter ingestion caused gut wall damage, decreased cholinesterase activity, and demonstrated biomagnification potential, suggesting that synthetic glitter particles pose measurable toxicological risks to aquatic organisms.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper