0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Plastic waste generation and emissions from the domestic open burning of plastic waste in Guatemala

Environmental Science Atmospheres 2022 32 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Michelle Bardales Cruz, Eri Saikawa, Mayarí Hengstermann, Alexander Ramirez, John P. McCracken, Lisa M. Thompson

Summary

Researchers estimated greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from household open burning of plastic waste in Guatemala, finding that rural areas lacking waste collection services contribute disproportionately to emissions and that plastic waste generation has increased significantly over time, underscoring the need for improved waste management infrastructure.

Domestic, or household-level, open burning of plastic waste is a source of air pollutants and greenhouse gases that are often neglected in emission inventories. Domestic open burning is a considerable concern in Guatemala due to the lack of access to waste collection services, particularly in rural areas. This paper offers the first attempt to estimate emissions from the domestic open burning of waste at the city and departmental levels in Guatemala. Data were collected from the Xalapán region of Jalapa, Guatemala and analyzed to determine the change in plastic waste generation over time as well as the socioeconomic factors that may affect the extent of plastic waste generation and burning. The annual per capita masses of plastic waste burned were used to estimate emissions from domestic open burning of plastic waste in the region of Xalapán, the cities of Jutiapa and Guatemala city, and all 22 departments in Guatemala. Our results show that rural areas burn more waste domestically, likely because of a lack of access to waste collection, and 30.4% of OC, 24.0% of BC, 23.6% of PM2.5, and 2.4% of CO2 emissions in Guatemala may not be accounted for by excluding open plastic burning as a source.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Assessing the Environmental Impact of Plastic Waste Incineration: A Case Study of Freetown, Sierra Leone

This case study of plastic waste incineration in Freetown, Sierra Leone found that open burning emits PM2.5, carbon monoxide, dioxins, and volatile organic compounds that harm resident health and local ecosystems, worsened by inadequate waste management infrastructure.

Article Tier 2

Addressing the Climate Crisis

This essay reflects on plastic pollution as a global justice issue through the author's fieldwork in rural Guatemala, where communities burn plastic waste in cooking fires due to lack of sanitation infrastructure, releasing toxic fumes and microplastics into the air and water. The author argues that plastic pollution is driven by corporate and colonial forces and calls for upstream policy solutions beyond individual community action.

Article Tier 2

Quantification, characteristics, and distribution of microplastics released from waste burning furnaces and their associated health impacts

Researchers quantified microplastics released from waste burning furnaces in Indonesia, finding 41-77 fiber-type particles at sampling sites near each furnace, with an estimated 1.9-2.3 microplastics entering the human body via inhalation, highlighting an overlooked airborne exposure pathway.

Review Tier 2

A comprehensive review of domestic-open waste burning: recent trends, methodology comparison, and factors assessment

Researchers systematically reviewed global open-waste burning practices, finding that emissions and health risks are understudied in developing countries and that combining behavioral surveys with air sampling methods would yield more robust emission inventories for risk assessment.

Article Tier 2

Solid Waste Management in Rural Communities of Developing Countries: An Overview of Challenges and Opportunities

This review examines the challenges of managing solid waste in rural communities of developing countries, where lack of infrastructure and knowledge often leads to dumping and uncontrolled burning. Researchers identified opportunities for turning waste into resources through composting, recycling, and community-based management programs. The study emphasizes that proper waste management in rural areas is essential for reducing environmental pollution, including plastic contamination, and protecting public health.

Share this paper