0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Circular Economy and the Changing Geography of International Trade in Plastic Waste

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022 23 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study analyzed over two decades of international trade data in plastic waste, finding increasingly complex transboundary flows as circular economy policies tightened, with China's 2018 import ban dramatically reshaping global plastic waste trade routes and highlighting ongoing challenges in achieving sustainable plastic material cycles.

Plastic pollution has become a major environmental concern worldwide. As the circular economy is increasingly seen as a means for achieving sustainable development, it is imperative to promote the more efficient use of plastics worldwide. An integral part of the circular economy model, trade in waste, and the scrap for recovery is a part of the solution to achieve sustainability. This paper studies the changing geography of the international trade in plastic waste. It reveals increasingly complex patterns of the transboundary trade in plastic waste over more than two decades. The movement of plastic waste from high-income countries to developing nations has been the largest flow, but trade flows of other directions turn out to be significant. The findings of the paper debunk the North-South or core-periphery dichotomy that is embedded in the international environment justice tradition (including the ecologically unequal exchange theory) as well as in international environmental regulatory regimes such as the Basel Convention. The paper contributes to the discussions about value that are central in political economic approaches to global trade (e.g., the global value chain and global production network) by demonstrating the relative, spatial, and dynamic nature of the concept. As the transboundary trade in plastic waste has exacerbated pollution and marine litter in some major receiving countries, it needs to be better monitored and regulated to ensure it is conducted in a transparent and environmentally sound manner. The paper also explores several policy measures that could help tackle the plastic pollution crisis and achieve sustainable development.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The Evolutionary Trend and Impact of Global Plastic Waste Trade Network

AI summary Read the abstract

Analysis of the global plastic waste trade network from 1988 to 2017 found that recent national import bans have reshaped trade flows, with waste being redirected from China to other developing nations rather than reducing overall plastic waste generation.

Article Tier 2

Global Plastic Waste Trade: An Analysis of Sources and Trends (1996-2024)

AI summary Read the abstract

The global trade in plastic waste — where wealthy nations ship plastic scraps to poorer ones for processing — has shaped recycling systems worldwide, but its sustainability is deeply contested. This bibliometric review of 257 academic papers (1996–2024) maps the research landscape, finding that China's 2018 ban on importing foreign plastic waste was a dominant topic, and that the trade raises serious concerns about environmental harm and economic inequality in recipient countries. The study underscores that international plastic waste flows are not a straightforward solution to the plastic crisis and require much closer scrutiny.

Article

The impact of china’s ban on plastic waste exporting countries

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed how China's 2018 ban on plastic waste imports restructured global recycling trade flows from 2008–2024, identifying three country groups—resilient, partially adapted, and market losers—and finding that nations less dependent on China adapted more successfully to the fragmented, technologically differentiated recycling landscape that followed.

Article Tier 2

Will you take my (s)crap? Waste havens in the global plastic waste trade

AI summary Read the abstract

This economic study analyzed global plastic waste trade flows following China's 2018 import ban, finding that plastic waste shifted to new destination countries in Southeast Asia and elsewhere. The global movement of plastic waste affects where it is processed and how much ends up in environments as microplastics.

Article

The Double Edged Sword: The Economic and Environmental Impact of China’s 2018 Imported Plastics Ban on U.S.-Asia Relations

AI summary Read the abstract

This study analyzed U.S. plastic waste export data from 2013 to 2024 following China's 2018 import ban, finding that while China's air pollution declined 34% as it stopped accepting plastic waste, Malaysia's PM2.5 levels rose 31% as imports surged — illustrating how plastic waste bans can shift environmental burdens to lower-income nations rather than solving the underlying problem.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper