We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Laundry and dry cleaning environments as a source of microplastics
Summary
Researchers collected dust samples from dry cleaning shops and analyzed microplastic presence and composition using stereo microscopy, ATR-FTIR, and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Samples contained 10 to 23 MPs of fragment, pellet, film, and foam types in size ranges of 1.2 to 5 mm, with PVA, Tencel, PA resin, polyurethane, EVA, and PET as dominant polymer types, representing one of the first investigations of MP contamination in indoor dry cleaning environments.
This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence and abundance of microplastics (MPs) in dry cleaner shops. Dust samples were collected by sweeping, and the participant shops were allowed to fill out the questionnaire regarding the type of clothes washed and dried, etc. Dust samples were passed through the sieve (≤ 5mm). The density separation of collected samples was done by sodium iodide, and the upper portion of the samples, which we could easily hold with forceps and were visible to the human eye (mostly millimeters), were transferred for further analysis. These millimeter-size MPs would have occupied the maximum filter area, and it would have otherwise hindered the characterization of micro and nano-plastics. The samples were morphologically analyzed under a stereo microscope, and ATR-FTIR did their chemical characterization; however, micro and nano-plastics were analyzed under micro-Raman for further studies. Sample one and two showed the presence of 10 and 23 MPs, respectively. The common MPs types were fragment, pellet, film, and foam. While their dominant colors were red, white, transparent, and black. The fragment was the predominant type of MPs. White and transparent were the dominant color of these MPs. The size of the identified MPs was between 1.2 to 5 mm. PVA, Tencel, PA resin, PA-11, PU, EVA, and PET were the predominant type of MPs seen in the study. Based on the literature, this is the first study conducted in the indoor environments of dry cleaner shops. This study showed that indoor environments of dry cleaner shops are sources of MPs. The textiles are rich sources of MPs, and during the washing, with the effects of water, friction and abrasion, and detergents, these MPs can easily shed. More work should be done on the occupational health impacts of these MPs released from the textiles as they are very harmful. Also see: https://micro2022.sciencesconf.org/426669/document
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Characterising microplastics in indoor air: Insights from Raman imaging analysis of air filter samples
Researchers analyzed air filters from an air conditioner and a computer that had been running indoors for half a year and found they had collected an estimated 73 to 88,000 microplastic fibers each. Most of the identified microplastics were PET fibers likely shed from synthetic clothing and textiles. This study confirms that people are continuously breathing in microplastic fibers in their homes and offices, and suggests air filters could serve as monitors for indoor microplastic exposure.
Airborne emissions of microplastic fibres from domestic laundry dryers
Domestic tumble dryers were confirmed as a source of airborne microplastic fibers, with samples taken during operation containing significantly more fibers than background air levels. The study is the first to measure microplastic fiber emissions from mechanical drying, identifying indoor air as a key exposure environment.
Commercial clothes dryers: a source of microfiber emissions to air
Researchers quantified microfiber emissions from commercial clothes dryers and measured deposition patterns around laundromats, identifying commercial dryers as a significant and poorly studied source of airborne microplastic pollution.
Microplastics in indoor deposition samples in university classrooms
Researchers analyzed microplastic contamination in dust collected from university classrooms and found particles from clothing fibers, shoes, and school supplies. Most particles were polyamide and polypropylene fibers ranging from 120 to over 2,000 micrometers in size, and surface damage on the particles suggests they may be breaking down into even smaller nanoplastics over time. Since people spend most of their time indoors, this indoor microplastic exposure is an important and underappreciated route of human contact with these particles.
Correlating Scanning Electron Microscopy and Raman Microscopy to Quantify Occupational Exposure to Micro- and Nanoscale Plastics in Textile Manufacturing
Researchers used a correlative SEM-Raman microscopy approach to quantify airborne micro- and nanoplastic particle exposure during polyester microfiber production in a textile manufacturing facility. The study found that sub-micrometer particles dominated the workplace aerosol, with PET being the main process-related nanoplastic type, providing substance-specific occupational exposure data that has been largely lacking in this field.