0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

A machine learning-based evidence map of ocean-related options for climate change mitigation and adaptation

npj Ocean Sustainability 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Laura Airoldi, Devi Veytia, Simon P. Neill, Gaël Mariani, Laura Airoldi, Laura Airoldi, Alexandre Magnan, Simon P. Neill, U. Rashid Sumaila, Simon P. Neill, Laura Airoldi, U. Rashid Sumaila, Vicky Martí Barclay, Simon P. Neill, Laura Airoldi, Laura Airoldi, Laura Airoldi, Joachim Claudet, Simon P. Neill, Joachim Claudet, Sarah Cooley, Laura Airoldi, Alexandre Magnan, Laura Airoldi, Laura Airoldi, Simon P. Neill, Simon P. Neill, Joachim Claudet, U. Rashid Sumaila, Olivier Thébaud, Christian R. Voolstra, Laura Airoldi, Phillip Williamson, Laura Airoldi, Olivier Thébaud, Marie Bonnin, Joseph Langridge, Adrien Comte, Frédérique Viard, Jean‐Pierre Gattuso Yunne‐Jai Shin, Yunne‐Jai Shin, Laurent Bopp, Laurent Bopp, Jean‐Pierre Gattuso U. Rashid Sumaila, Olivier Thébaud, U. Rashid Sumaila, Christian R. Voolstra, Christian R. Voolstra, Christian R. Voolstra, Christian R. Voolstra, Jean‐Pierre Gattuso

Summary

Researchers trained an AI model to map and classify nearly 44,000 scientific papers on ocean-based strategies for addressing climate change, finding that 80% of research focuses on reducing emissions while far fewer studies address adapting to climate impacts. The analysis also revealed that research effort is heavily concentrated in wealthier nations, despite poorer regions facing the greatest climate risks.

The ocean has a vital role to play in addressing the global challenge of climate change, which requires both mitigation and adaptation actions. The exponential increase in research relating to ocean-related options (OROs) requires a rapid and reproducible method to assess the state of knowledge. We train a state-of-the-art large language model to characterise the landscape of ORO research by classifying 44,193 (±11,615) articles across various descriptors. Research proves to be unevenly distributed, concentrating on OROs with mitigation objectives (80%), while revealing research gaps including under-researched ecosystems and an observed paucity of studies simultaneously assessing different ORO types. We also uncover social inequalities driven by mismatches between the global distribution of research effort, climate change responsibility, and risk. These findings are important to maximise the efficacy of OROs, position them within broader climate action portfolios, and inform future research priorities.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper