We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Circular economy-based product substitution design rationale: A case of personal care product
AI summary Read the abstract
This life cycle assessment study compared the environmental impact of plastic versus wood-based toothbrushes, finding that wood-based alternatives offer measurable environmental benefits in terms of reduced plastic waste. The study demonstrates how circular economy principles can guide product redesign to reduce reliance on petroleum-based plastics in everyday consumer goods.
Purpose: This study describes an empirical study demonstrating the application of circular economy (CE) to respond to an urgent call to reduce plastic waste by utilizing waste from the furniture industry.Design/methodology/approach: this study employed the measurements of environmental impacts of plastic and wood-based toothbrushes using a life cycle assessment, complemented by an analysis of the wood substitution design process from a CE perspective.Findings: The findings from this study not only shed light on quantifying the benefits of product valorization improvement and retention but also provide a means of weighing the value against raw materials and production costs.Research limitations/implications: The developed model is still limited to the use of waste to replace existing product materials. This study also did not include other industrial waste such as agro-industrial waste or other degradable materials which may open up many chances for further studies.Practical implications: The study’s primary contribution is a design rationale that assists the substitution of plastic material with wood waste, using toothbrushes as a case example of the substituted products.Social implications: This newly developed material can give potential income sources for the communities.Originality/value: The novelty of this study lies to the substitution model of non-degradable materials to a more environmentally-friendly material which is studied thoroughly from functional analysis, design alternatives, and evaluation based on environmental, economic, and social aspects especially in case of personal care products (toothbrush).
More Papers Like This
Life cycle assessment of manual toothbrush materials
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted a life cycle assessment of manual toothbrushes and found that models with silicone bristles have about 14% less environmental impact across 18 categories compared to nylon-bristled brushes, and that replacing only the brush head instead of the whole toothbrush saves nearly 5 grams of CO2 equivalent per use. Since nylon and polypropylene toothbrush components shed microplastics, this study supports switching to more sustainable materials and modular designs.
Bio-based plastics in a circular economy: A review of recovery pathways and implications for product design
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed how bio-based plastics — made from renewable plant sources — can be recovered and recycled at end-of-life, finding that the feasibility of eight different recovery methods depends heavily not just on plastic chemistry but on how products are designed, and offering guidance for designers to improve recyclability.
Combining Eco-Design and LCA as Decision-Making Process to Prevent Plastics in Packaging Application
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers applied simultaneous eco-design and life cycle assessment (LCA) to help a small food packaging company redesign its frozen food packaging to reduce plastic use and microplastic dispersal into marine environments. The case study demonstrated that integrating circular economy principles and LCA from the design stage enabled more effective material substitution decisions than applying these tools sequentially.
Environmental Payback Periods of Reusable Alternatives to Single- Use Plastic Kitchenware Products
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers used life cycle assessment to compare the environmental payback periods of reusable alternatives to single-use plastic kitchenware, finding that reusable items need to be used many times before their environmental impact is lower than single-use plastics. The results challenge the assumption that reusable alternatives are always more environmentally friendly, depending on material and usage frequency.
Life Cycle Assessment of Selected Single-Use Plastic Products towards Evidence-Based Policy Recommendations in Sri Lanka
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers applied life cycle assessment to common single-use plastic products in Sri Lanka, quantifying their environmental impacts across production to disposal and providing evidence-based recommendations to guide national plastic pollution policy.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.