0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

A short review on the recent method development for extraction and identification of microplastics in mussels and fish, two major groups of seafood

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2022 55 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Walter Dellisanti, Matthew Ming-Lok Leung, Matthew Ming-Lok Leung, Karen Wing-Kei Lam, Youji Wang, Menghong Hu, Hoi‐Shing Lo, James Kar Hei Fang, James Kar Hei Fang

Summary

This review summarized the methods used to extract and identify microplastics in mussels and fish, two major seafood groups. Researchers found that alkaline digestion was the most common extraction technique while FTIR spectroscopy was the predominant identification method. The study recommends standardizing analytical protocols to enable better comparison of microplastic contamination data across different studies of seafood.

The prevalence of microplastics in the marine environment poses potential health risks to humans through seafood consumption. Relevant data are available but the diverse analytical approaches adopted to characterise microplastics have hampered data comparison among studies. Here, the techniques for extraction and identification of microplastics are summarised among studies of marine mussels and fish, two major groups of seafood. Among the reviewed papers published in 2018-2021, the most common practice to extract microplastics was through tissue digestion in alkaline chemicals (46 % for mussels, 56 % for fish) and oxidative chemicals (28 % for mussels, 12 % for fish). High-density solutions such as sodium chloride could be used to isolate microplastics from other undigested residues by flotation. Polymer analysis of microplastics was mainly carried out with Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (58 % for both mussels and fish) and Raman spectroscopy (14 % for mussels, 8 % for fish). Among these methods, we recommend alkaline digestion for microplastic extraction, and the automated mapping approach of FTIR or Raman spectroscopy for microplastic identification. Overall, this study highlights the need for a standard protocol for characterising microplastics in seafood samples.

Share this paper