0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Public perceptions of climate change and health – A cross-sectional survey study

Research Square (Research Square) 2022 Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Katharina van Baal, Stephanie Stiel, Peter Schulte

Summary

Researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess public perceptions of the links between climate change and human health, examining awareness of how rising temperatures, extreme weather, air pollution, and environmental degradation affect morbidity and mortality. The study found variable levels of public understanding across demographic groups, with implications for health communication and climate policy engagement.

Abstract Background Climate change is inseparably linked to human health and has a direct impact on morbidity and mortality. Increasing temperatures, extreme weather events, air pollution and altered vector transmissions are leading to cardiovascular, respiratory and infectious diseases. Although there is growing awareness of the threats to human health caused by climate change, it remains unclear how the German population perceives the relevance of climate change and its health consequences. Methods Between May and September 2022, German residents were invited to participate in a cross-sectional online survey. In addition to collecting demographic data, the survey explored three content areas: (1) the relevance of climate change, (2) health risks in connection with climate change and (3) collective and individual options for action against climate change. Data were analysed descriptively. Results Over the 20-week survey period, 697 full data sets were collected for analysis (72% female, 51% ≥55 years old). The majority of participants agreed that human-induced climate change (likely) exists (85%), and that it has an impact on human health (83%). They also perceived the global population to be more strongly impacted by climate change than the German population (89% versus 74%). Most (68%) participants saw themselves affected by climate change, and approximately one in five respondents (18%) reported negative health experiences due to climate change. Accidents/deaths due to extreme weather events were perceived as the most relevant health risk in connection with climate change (62%). The majority (76%) of participants claimed to personally contribute to climate protection and 23% felt that their city or council contributed to climate protection. Conclusion Although the majority of participants saw climate change as a threat to human health, they perceived other population groups (i.e. outside of Germany) to be most strongly affected. Cognitive dissonance might explain this lack of individual concern. One approach to addressing such distorted perceptions might be the dissemination of appropriate risk communication highlighting existing health threats due to climate change, with health professionals involved in the communication. Cities and councils should play a more active role in promoting climate protection and make their actions visible to the public.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Health—A Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Researchers surveyed 697 German residents about their perceptions of climate change and its health impacts. While 85% agreed that human-induced climate change exists and 83% believed it affects health, most perceived the global population as more affected than themselves. The study suggests that cognitive dissonance may explain why people acknowledge climate health risks in general but underestimate their own personal vulnerability.

Article Tier 2

Health Literacy and Environmental Risks Focusing Air Pollution: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in Germany

Researchers surveyed health literacy related to air pollution risks in a sample of the German general population. The study found that people's understanding of environmental health risks varied based on their information sources and prior knowledge, suggesting that more targeted communication strategies are needed to help the public better understand and respond to air quality threats.

Article Tier 2

Climate Change and Human Health

This paper reviews the relationship between climate change and human health, covering effects of global warming on infectious disease, heat stress, food security, and mental health, and situating these risks within the historical trajectory of anthropogenic climate forcing.

Article Tier 2

Climate Change and Adverse Public Health Impacts on Human Health and Water Resources

This review examines how climate change is creating interconnected threats to public health and freshwater resources worldwide. Researchers found that rising temperatures, shifting precipitation patterns, and extreme weather events are degrading water quality through increased contamination from pollutants including microplastics. The study highlights the urgent need for integrated strategies that address water management, pollution control, and public health simultaneously.

Article Tier 2

Increasing urban health awareness using an interactive approach: evidence from a school-based study

Researchers conducted a school-based study to evaluate an interactive approach for increasing urban health awareness among students, with a focus on the health consequences of climate change and urbanization. The study found evidence that participatory school interventions can improve health literacy and adaptive capacity among urban youth, supporting WHO recommendations for health-promoting schools.

Share this paper