We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Anthropogenic nest materials in two distinct populations of migratory bird in Europe.
Summary
Researchers examined the incorporation of anthropogenic nest materials, including plastic debris, by two distinct migratory bird populations in Europe, assessing how habitat transformation and plastic pollution affect nesting behavior. The study found that birds in both populations used plastic materials as nest components, with the prevalence and types of anthropogenic materials reflecting local availability and degree of habitat modification.
Abstract Transformation of natural habitats into farming lands and spread of built up areas has a pervasive effect on wildlife, especially for birds. Also, plastic pollution is affecting wildlife on a global scale. Discarded plastic is ubiquitous and accessible for birds, which can be incorporated in the nest structure. By now, a large collection of studies has been published regarding the anthropogenic nest material incorporation by birds. However, studies are predominately biased to marine birds. To balance this disproportion, we describe here the differences in type, prevalence and the amount of anthropogenic nest materials between two populations of terrestrial, mainly farmland bird, the white stork Ciconia ciconia on a broad geographical scale, from two migratory divides – eastern in Poland and western in Spain (in total 303 nests). We detected significant differences in anthropogenic nest material incorporation between two populations in regard to human pressure reflected by Human Footprint Index (HFI) and urbanisation level measured by Impervious Surface Areas (ISA). In Spanish population, we found that probability of anthropogenic nest material incorporation was positively related to ISA, and amount of anthropogenic nest material was positively associated to HFI, in contrast to Polish one, where there was no significant relationship. Moreover, we showed that the prevalence of nests with anthropogenic nest material was two times higher in Spanish than in Polish white stork population. This study demonstrates that the vulnerability to solid waste pollution differs on a population scale within one species.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Why do some bird species incorporate more anthropogenic materials into their nests than others?
This review examines why certain bird species incorporate plastic and other human-made materials into their nests more than others, considering factors like habitat, diet, and nesting style. While the materials can sometimes provide benefits like pest deterrence, they also carry risks including entanglement and reduced insulation. The study illustrates how pervasive plastic pollution has become in natural ecosystems, with wildlife interactions serving as indicators of environmental microplastic contamination.
The prevalence of anthropogenic nest materials differs between two distinct populations of migratory birds in Europe
Researchers found significant differences in anthropogenic nest material use between two white stork populations in Poland and Spain, with incorporation of plastic and other human-made materials linked to local Human Footprint Index and land use patterns.
Do birds select the plastics debris used for nest construction? A case study in a Mediterranean agricultural landscape
Researchers studied plastic debris in the nests of two Mediterranean bird species and found that both magpies and serins actively select plastic filaments over other plastic shapes — likely because filaments resemble natural nesting fibers — with 71–96% of nests containing plastic, raising concerns about wildlife behavioral adaptation to pervasive pollution.
Plastic debris in bird nests: sources, ecological impacts, and bioindicator potential for monitoring microplastic pollution
This review examines how birds increasingly use plastic debris as nesting material, and the ecological consequences of this behavior. Researchers found that the most common plastics in nests are polypropylene and polyethylene, which fragment into smaller pieces over time, exposing birds to entanglement, ingestion, and toxic chemical additives. The study suggests that birds can serve as useful bioindicators for monitoring the extent of microplastic pollution in their surrounding environments.
Variation in the use of anthropogenic materials in tit nests: influence of human activities and pandemic restrictions
Researchers studied the nesting materials of great tits and blue tits in a suburban area of Portugal and found that nearly 10% of materials in great tit nests were human-made, including synthetic fibers and plastic fragments. More anthropogenic materials were found in nests closer to roads and developed areas. This research illustrates how plastic pollution infiltrates even the nesting behavior of wild birds, demonstrating the pervasiveness of microplastic contamination in the environment.