0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Reproductive & Development Sign in to save

How to get citizen science data accepted by the scientific community? Insights from the Plastic Pirates project

2022 7 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Katrin Kruse, Sinja Dittmann, Sinja Dittmann, Katrin Kruse, Dennis Brennecke, Dennis Brennecke, Dennis Brennecke, Dennis Brennecke, Sinja Dittmann, Tim Kiessling, Tim Kiessling, Tim Kiessling, Tim Kiessling, Sinja Dittmann, Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Tim Kiessling, Martín Thiel Sinja Dittmann, Sinja Dittmann, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Sinja Dittmann, Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Martín Thiel Sinja Dittmann, Martín Thiel Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Dennis Brennecke, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Kruse, Tim Kiessling, Katrin Kruse, Tim Kiessling, Tim Kiessling, Katrin Kruse, Katrin Kruse, Katrin Kruse, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Dennis Brennecke, Katrin Kruse, Dennis Brennecke, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Tim Kiessling, Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Katrin Knickmeier, Sinja Dittmann, Sinja Dittmann, Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Dennis Brennecke, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Ilka Parchmann, Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Sinja Dittmann, Tim Kiessling, Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Sinja Dittmann, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Katrin Knickmeier, Katrin Knickmeier, Martín Thiel Ilka Parchmann, Tim Kiessling, Ilka Parchmann, Martín Thiel Ilka Parchmann, Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel Martín Thiel

Summary

This study from the Plastic Pirates citizen science project examines what conditions help citizen science data gain acceptance from the scientific community, finding that transparency, protocols, and collaboration with professional scientists are key.

Data resulting from citizen science investigations are often questioned as most participants do not (yet) have a thorough scientific education. This is especially true for projects taking place in schools, and conducting citizen science in this context is further complicated by different motivations of participants and a busy school curriculum. Herein we present strategies to ensure quality of data generated by the citizen science project Plastic Pirates in which schoolchildren investigated litter pollution at and in rivers. We show how formulating concise research questions, offering accompanying educational material, employing data quality mechanisms in the field (photographs, standardized sampling methods and self-evaluation) as well as transparently detailing which datasets were excluded from analysis was vital to accomplish the acceptance of resulting citizen science data by the scientific community.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper