0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Comparative selective pressure potential of antibiotics in the environment

Environmental Pollution 2022 34 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yasmine Emara, Peter Fantke Olivier Jolliet, Olivier Jolliet, Olivier Jolliet, Olivier Jolliet, Matthias Finkbeiner, Matthias Finkbeiner, Peter Fantke Peter Fantke Peter Fantke Olivier Jolliet, Stefanie Heß, Peter Fantke Matthias Finkbeiner, Matthias Finkbeiner, Peter Fantke Olivier Jolliet, Olivier Jolliet, Olivier Jolliet, Marissa B. Kosnik, Marc‐William Siegert, Peter Fantke Peter Fantke Peter Fantke Peter Fantke

Summary

Researchers developed a life-cycle-based framework to compare the antibiotic resistance selection pressure potential of various antibiotics in the environment, finding that measured environmental concentrations of certain antibiotics exceed predicted thresholds for resistance selection.

Study Type Environmental

To guide both environmental and public health policy, it is important to assess the degree of antibiotic resistance selection pressure under measured environmental concentrations (MECs), and to compare the efficacy of different mitigation strategies to minimize the spread of resistance. To this end, the resistance selection and enrichment potential due to antibiotic emissions into the environment must be analysed from a life cycle perspective, for a wide range of antibiotics, and considering variations in the underlying fitness costs between different resistance mutations and genes. The aim of this study is to consistently derive fitness cost-dependent minimum selective concentrations (MSCs) from readily available bacterial inhibition data and to build MSC-based species sensitivity distributions (SSDs). These are then used to determine antibiotic-specific resistance selection concentrations predicted to promote resistance in 5% of exposed bacterial species (RSC<sub>5</sub>). Using a previously developed competition model, we provide estimated MSC<sub>10</sub> endpoints for 2,984 antibiotic and bacterial species combinations; the largest set of modelled MSCs available to date. Based on constructed SSDs, we derive RSC<sub>5</sub> for 128 antibiotics with four orders of magnitude difference in their 'selective pressure potential' in the environment. By comparing our RSC<sub>5</sub> to MECs, we highlight specific environmental compartments (e.g. hospital and wastewater effluents, lakes and rivers), as well as several antibiotics (e.g. ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, enrofloxacin, and tetracycline), to be scrutinized for their potential role in resistance selection and dissemination. In addition to enabling comparative risk screening of the selective pressure potential of multiple antibiotics, our SSD-derived RSC<sub>5</sub> provide the point of departure for calculating new life cycle-based characterization factors for antibiotics to compare mitigation strategies, thereby contributing towards a 'One-Health' approach to tackling the global antibiotic resistance crisis.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper