0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Number of simultaneously acting global change factors affects composition, diversity and productivity of grassland plant communities

Nature Communications 2022 72 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Benedikt Speißer, Rutger A. Wilschut, Mark van Kleunen

Summary

Researchers exposed grassland plant communities to increasing numbers of simultaneous global change stressors — such as warming, pollution, and nutrient enrichment — finding that multiple combined stressors reduced plant species diversity even when no single stressor alone had that effect. This highlights that studying environmental threats in isolation can underestimate their true ecological damage.

Plant communities experience impacts of increasing numbers of global change factors (e.g., warming, eutrophication, pollution). Consequently, unpredictable global change effects could arise. However, information about multi-factor effects on plant communities is scarce. To test plant-community responses to multiple global change factors (GCFs), we subjected sown and transplanted-seedling communities to increasing numbers (0, 1, 2, 4, 6) of co-acting GCFs, and assessed effects of individual factors and increasing numbers of GCFs on community composition and productivity. GCF number reduced species diversity and evenness of both community types, whereas none of the individual factors alone affected these measures. In contrast, GCF number positively affected the productivity of the transplanted-seedling community. Our findings show that simultaneously acting GCFs can affect plant communities in ways differing from those expected from single factor effects, which may be due to biological effects, sampling effects, or both. Consequently, exploring the multifactorial nature of global change is crucial to better understand ecological impacts of global change.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Diversity and productivity of a natural grassland decline with the number of global change factors

Researchers studied how multiple simultaneous global change factors — including elevated CO2, warming, drought, and nitrogen deposition — affect the diversity and productivity of natural grasslands. They found that grassland diversity and productivity decline as the number of combined global change factors increases.

Article Tier 2

Diversity and productivity of a natural grassland decline with the number of global change factors

Researchers conducted a field experiment in a Chinese grassland to test the combined effects of up to eight human-caused environmental stressors, including microplastic pollution, nitrogen deposition, and pesticide use. They found that grassland productivity and species diversity declined sharply as the number of simultaneous stressors increased, with eight combined factors reducing both by roughly 43 percent. The study demonstrates that multiple environmental pressures, including microplastics, have compounding negative effects on natural ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Number and dissimilarity of global change factors influences soil properties and functions

Researchers investigated how multiple environmental stressors, including microplastics, climate change, and chemical pollution, affect soil health when they act together. The study found that the more different the stressors are in how they work, the more they amplify each other's harmful effects on important soil functions like decomposition and enzyme activity.

Article Tier 2

Soil nutrient heterogeneity alters productivity and diversity of experimental plant communities under multiple global change factors

This paper is not about microplastics — it examines how soil nutrient heterogeneity interacts with multiple global change factors (such as drought or elevated CO2) to influence the productivity and species diversity of plant communities in outdoor mesocosm experiments.

Article Tier 2

Increasing soil microplastic diversity decreases community biomass via its impact on the most dominant species

Researchers experimentally mixed different numbers and types of microplastics into soil hosting six plant species, finding that greater variety of microplastic types in the soil reduced total plant biomass — mainly by suppressing the growth of the dominant grass species. The results suggest that real-world environments contaminated with multiple types of microplastics may suffer greater ecological harm than studies using a single plastic type would predict.

Share this paper